A curated hub of legal analysis, practical guides, and timely updates from Grigoras Law—written for clients, professionals, and the public.
Grigoras Law’s Information Portal gathers plain-language explainers, case commentaries, and practice notes across
civil litigation, commercial litigation, business law, appeals, and select cross-border topics (including international
and Nevada matters). We focus on practical takeaways, Ontario procedure, and timely developments—so you can move
from reading to action with confidence.
In the case of Environmental Waterproofing Inc v. Huron Tract Holdings Inc., [2023] O.J. No. 157, the court was tasked with determining which creditor had priority over a garnishment of funds held by the Sheriff.
In Ontario, under the Ontario Business Corporations Act, directors of a corporation have a legal responsibility to ensure that the corporation is financially stable before making certain transactions. This includes the payment of dividends, redemption or reacquisition of shares, reduction of stated capital, or provision of financial assistance to certain non-arm’s length persons.
As a director or officer of a public corporation in Ontario, it’s crucial to be aware of the legal implications of your actions. The Criminal Code of Canada includes a number of provisions that pertain to fraud, and these can apply to those in leadership positions within a company.
In Ontario, the Occupiers’ Liability Amendment Act, 2020, often known as Bill 118, made substantial modifications to the filing process for personal injury claims caused by snow or ice on private property. The modifications to the Occupiers’ Liability Act imposed new notification requirements on claimants.
The question of how cryptocurrencies are classified under Canadian bankruptcy law has again been brought to the forefront with the collapse of Bahamas-based cryptocurrency exchange FTX . . . While there is broad acceptance that cryptocurrencies are likely assets, there is no widespread agreement on how to classify them – are they financial assets, intangible assets, inventory, investment property or something else?
When it comes to court-appointed receiverships, there can be much confusion surrounding the issue of rent obligations. Essentially, the main tension arises from the fact that existing legal principles don’t always align with what a receiver would like to do in practice.
Found this article helpful? When it’s time to act, our team handles civil, commercial, and appellate work across Ontario (and select cross-border matters). Clear strategy, responsive service, and focused advocacy—start with a brief intake.
our team of experienced lawyers are at your service