Ontario offers a broad spectrum of commercial leasing scenarios, from high-rise office spaces in major cities to industrial warehouses or rural business properties. In each case, the lease is not merely an arrangement to pay rent; it is a contract that shapes the rights and duties of both landlord and tenant. Unlike residential tenancy law, which is heavily regulated, commercial leasing relies on negotiated terms and contractual principles, with the Commercial Tenancies Act (CTA) providing a default safety net. Understanding how these statutes dovetail with custom clauses is critical for avoiding disputes, clarifying maintenance and repair duties, and reducing financial or operational hazards.
There are a few key aspects to commercial leasing in Ontario, including how the CTA can fill gaps if the contract is silent, how rent structures might pass property taxes or maintenance costs onto tenants, and how renewal terms can lock in stable occupancy. There are also other things to consider (in more unfortunate circumstances), like a landlord’s right of distress for unpaid rent, the process of lease termination when there is no direct breach, or what happens if one party declares bankruptcy. From subletting to mandatory insurance, effective drafting is essential—landlords must ensure consistent cash flow and property care, while tenants need stable, cost-effective premises that align with their business objectives.
Ultimately, commercial leasing is best approached with thorough drafting and awareness of the CTA’s provisions. Overlooking critical clauses—like who fixes major structural damage or how large rent escalations can be—threatens financial viability and can even force a business to relocate. By consulting knowledgeable professionals, landlords and tenants can define fair obligations, incorporate well-structured renewal and exit rights, and keep the working relationship cooperative and predictable.
The Commercial Tenancies Act applies to non-residential tenancies in Ontario and provides a baseline legal framework that parties can modify by explicit agreement. In contrast to the detailed restrictions found in residential legislation, the CTA is more flexible, enabling commercial entities to shape many aspects on their own. However, certain CTA rules—like those regulating a landlord’s ability to seize tenant goods for unpaid rent (distress) or re-enter the premises—remain significant, especially if the lease is silent or ambiguous. For instance, if a contract does not clarify how or when the landlord can repossess for rent arrears, the default CTA rules on notice requirements and re-entry apply.
CTA as a Supplement or Safety Net
The CTA’s provisions often serve as a safety net where the contract lacks detail. Landlords, for example, may rely on it to confirm their right of distress or to handle lease terminations properly. Meanwhile, tenants might invoke CTA sections to challenge lockouts or seizures they believe were executed improperly or without adequate notice. Because commercial leases are generally contract-driven, parties typically override many default CTA provisions with specially tailored clauses. If they fail to do so, or if the language is incomplete, the CTA steps in with default guidelines.
Potential Pitfalls if CTA is Ignored
Failing to consider CTA requirements can lead to unwanted consequences. A landlord might inadvertently violate rules on re-entry timing or notice, giving the tenant grounds for compensation. A tenant may incorrectly assume they have certain protective rights that do not exist in the contract and only partially exist under the CTA. As a result, sound legal advice ensures the lease respects or explicitly modifies CTA rules where necessary. Effective drafting also reduces the chance of confusion about enforcement remedies, notice periods, or the permissible scope of distress and re-entry. Ultimately, the CTA’s presence means neither landlord nor tenant can rely solely on their contract to solve every scenario—understanding how the Act applies or is overridden is essential.
Identifying Ownership and Management
In commercial contexts, the landlord may be the direct property owner, or it might be a ground lessee who subleases to another business occupant. Ownership could reside with an individual investor, a corporation, or even a pension fund. Often, a property management firm handles daily administration on behalf of the landlord—collecting rent, overseeing repairs, interfacing with tenants—though it does not generally assume the landlord’s legal rights or obligations unless appointed as an agent with sufficient authority.
Where the landlord is part of a larger real estate portfolio, the lease might identify an asset management entity or a general partner representing limited partners behind the scenes. Tenants need clarity on who holds final decision-making power—whether it is the property manager, the institutional owner, or an investment group—especially for matters like lease amendments or major capital upgrades.
Tenants and Their Business Use
On the tenant side, occupant variety is vast: retail shops, restaurants, offices, manufacturing plants, or distribution centres. The lease must detail the approved business activities, avoiding usage expansions that could strain building systems or conflict with other tenants’ operations. For example, a landlord might limit the tenant’s right to operate a bakery if the building’s ventilation is not equipped for heavy cooking. In multi-tenant retail plazas, the landlord often arranges an appropriate balance of shops, preventing direct competition or nuisance uses that disrupt synergy. The tenant must comply with any local bylaws, zoning restrictions, and building codes relevant to its business. If the tenant wants to sublease part of the space, it typically requires prior landlord consent, which may hinge on evaluating the sublessee’s creditworthiness, ensuring the sublease does not conflict with other occupant covenants, or verifying that usage remains consistent with the broader property design.
Defining Rentable Space and Common Areas
Clarification of the Area
A pivotal step is precisely defining what portion of the property is let to the tenant. For instance, in an office complex, the lease spells out the designated suite number and possibly references the total square footage. This can involve distinguishing between net usable area (actual occupant space) and rentable area (which may include a proportion of common corridors). In a shopping centre, the area might include a specific storefront plus storage or signage areas. Without a well-defined description, disputes can emerge over expansions, shared hallways, or parking allocations.
Common Area Maintenance (CAM)
In multi-tenant developments, the lease usually covers how shared spaces—like lobbies, restrooms, parking lots, corridors, or landscaping—are maintained and how costs are split. CAM fees typically factor in each tenant’s pro-rata share based on a ratio of their rented area to the total. The lease might empower the landlord to adjust CAM charges annually if operational expenses (like snow removal or security) change. Tenants often demand a cap on administrative fees to ensure the landlord does not pass through disproportionate overhead or management costs. Disagreements over CAM reconciliation—especially if the building covers a broad variety of uses—can become significant friction points, so transparent definitions in the lease (e.g., what is included in maintenance vs. capital improvements) helps avoid acrimony.
Term Length and Renewals
Structuring the Lease Duration
Commercial leases in Ontario might last anywhere from one year to 20+ years, depending on the nature of the tenant’s business, capital investment, or the landlord’s long-term strategy. For example, a flagship retail store might desire a lengthy term to justify expensive build-outs, while a start-up might prefer a shorter term to retain flexibility. The CTA does not dictate standard durations, leaving it to the parties to fix what suits them. Sometimes, an initial term extends for five years, with an option to renew for another five, subject to renegotiating rent. This arrangement balances both security and the possibility of adjusting to changing market rates.
Negotiating Renewal Rights
A well-crafted lease clarifies the mechanics of renewal. The tenant commonly must deliver written notice of intent to renew within a set window, perhaps six to nine months before expiry. The rent for the renewal might be pegged to a formula, or it might require a separate negotiation (with a fallback to arbitration if the parties disagree). If no such mechanism exists, a holdover can occur, in which the tenant remains month-to-month under more precarious conditions—paying possibly higher rent or facing short notice for eviction. Alternatively, the landlord may wish to keep expansions or redevelopments flexible, not granting automatic renewal. For a tenant, losing the premises suddenly can be disruptive, so secure renewal terms can be critical, especially if the business invests heavily in the location’s branding and local client base.
Rent, Taxes, and Other Monetary Obligations
Beyond Base Rent
Commercial rent is rarely just a monthly base figure. Many leases adopt net or triple net structures, shifting variable costs (property taxes, building insurance, maintenance) onto the tenant. A net lease might require the tenant to pay base rent plus all property taxes, while a triple net scenario might also impose building insurance and common area maintenance. Some tenants face utility or HVAC charges as well, or a portion of capital improvements. On top of that, any rent arrears typically accrue interest, ensuring the landlord recovers costs if the tenant falls behind.
Taxes and Rent Adjustments
If property taxes spike due to a municipal reassessment, the landlord often flows the incremental cost to tenants. The lease might lock in proportionate cost shares for each occupant, recalculating the tenant’s share of tax burdens. Tenants also might pay HST on rent if their business is not tax-exempt. In certain retail spaces, the lease includes a percentage rent concept, requiring the tenant to pay a percentage of gross sales once surpassing a set threshold. That approach aligns landlord-tenant interests in driving shopper traffic. The contract must specify precisely how to calculate and verify these figures, especially if the tenant has multiple revenue streams or an e-commerce component. Clarifying how pass-through costs are calculated, audited, and reconciled annually is vital to preventing nasty surprises or meltdown over opaque operating cost statements.
Other Covenants and Priorities
Repairs, Alterations, and Other Duties
Commercial leases commonly detail the tenant’s duty to maintain the leased area (like interior finishing, floors, or paint) versus the landlord’s duty (structural walls, roof, major systems). If large-scale capital repairs become necessary—say replacing a roof—some net leases push that expense to tenants, while others keep it on the landlord. The lease might also outline improvement allowances, letting the tenant build out custom features with or without cost-sharing from the landlord. The landlord retains a right to approve major alterations for code compliance or aesthetic consistency.
Priority of Leases Over Mortgages
If the landlord has a mortgage in place before signing the lease, that mortgage typically outranks the lease in a foreclosure scenario. The mortgagee might disclaim or terminate the lease if the landlord defaults, unless the tenant negotiates a non-disturbance agreement ensuring continued occupancy. Conversely, if the lease pre-dates the mortgage, the tenant’s rights generally outrank that mortgage. Tenants are wise to request a subordination, non-disturbance, and attornment (SNDA) clause clarifying these relationships, so they do not risk eviction if the landlord’s lender enforces foreclosure. These priority matters can dramatically affect a tenant’s security of tenure and the landlord’s flexibility in financing.
Commercial leases intersect with tax obligations in multiple ways. Typically, tenants pay a share of property taxes proportionate to their rented area, especially in multi-tenant complexes. The lease should clarify whether the landlord calculates that proportion using the building’s total leasable or leased area. Abrupt revaluations by municipal authorities might spike the building’s tax bill significantly, which can filter down to tenants under net lease structures. A large tenant in a combined industrial/retail space might see tax charges double if municipal rates shift or if the property’s assessment changes after improvements.
Furthermore, the province’s harmonized sales tax (HST) usually applies on rent unless the occupant’s activities qualify for an exemption. Tenants who operate a taxable enterprise typically claim input tax credits on HST paid, offsetting the financial burden. Meanwhile, if a tenant’s business is in a zero-rated or exempt field (like certain healthcare operations), HST on rent could be a non-recoverable outlay. The lease must be explicit about how HST is calculated, ensuring no misunderstandings. If the contract lumps all charges into a single figure, confusion might arise about the tax portion. Additionally, specialized taxes, such as signage fees or local improvement levies, might appear in the breakdown. The parties should confirm who shoulders such taxes and how the landlord notifies the tenant of any changes during the term.
Tenant Insolvency
Impact on Rent and Occupation
When a tenant declares bankruptcy, the landlord’s options can shift dramatically. Under the CTA and federal insolvency laws, the landlord cannot simply continue to seize rent or property for pre-filing arrears once the tenant is under bankruptcy protection. For sums owed before the bankruptcy date, the landlord usually becomes an unsecured creditor, lining up with others in the bankrupt estate. In some situations, the trustee may disclaim the lease as an onerous contract, freeing the estate from future rent obligations. This can leave the landlord scrambling to find new occupants. If the trustee assigns the lease to a financially stable occupant, the landlord might see minimal disruption, though landlord consent is typically required for assignment.
Distress Limitations and Post-Bankruptcy Liabilities
While distress is a key remedy for landlords, in a tenant’s bankruptcy scenario, it must be employed cautiously. Distress for pre-bankruptcy rent cannot continue once the tenant is officially bankrupt. Landlords sometimes attempt to enforce distress between the moment the tenant is insolvent and any formal bankruptcy filing if they sense a petition is imminent, but timing can be risky. For post-filing rent, the bankrupt occupant presumably pays as an administrative expense if it continues occupation, though the trustee might arrange a short bridging period or immediate surrender. Clarifying in the lease how defaults and insolvency events are handled—like mandatory deposits or landlord recourse to securities—can mitigate potential losses.
Landlord Insolvency
Receiver or Trustee Takes Over
While less common, a landlord can face its own insolvency if it fails to service mortgages or other debts. A lender or court might appoint a receiver, or the landlord might file for creditor protection. Tenants then must confirm they continue paying rent to the receiver or trustee, who steps into the landlord’s shoes for collecting revenue and fulfilling essential duties like building maintenance. Typically, the receiver tries to preserve property value, ensuring that tenants remain stable to maximize rental income. However, if the property is sold under receivership, new ownership might renegotiate or potentially disclaim certain leases if allowed by underlying financing documents. Tenants can protect themselves by requiring a non-disturbance or attornment agreement with the landlord’s lender, ensuring they are not abruptly forced out if the landlord collapses financially.
Commercial leases frequently address a tenant’s right to assign or sublet, acknowledging that business models evolve. The tenant might outgrow the space, relocate, or scale down. The lease generally conditions assignment on the landlord’s prior consent, which cannot be unreasonably withheld in many standard forms. The landlord typically reviews the proposed assignee’s credit history, business plan, and intended use. If it matches the landlord’s property mix and the prospective occupant is financially sound, consent is rarely withheld. Nonetheless, some leases allow the landlord to recapture the premises instead of consenting, known as a right to terminate the lease if assignment is requested. This approach might benefit the landlord if a new occupant can pay higher rent or if it plans renovations.
Subletting is a partial transfer, leaving the original tenant still bound to the landlord. The subtenant pays the prime tenant, who in turn pays the landlord. If the subtenant defaults, the prime tenant remains on the hook. The landlord rarely forms a direct legal bond with the subtenant unless explicitly agreed. As a result, the original tenant must vigilantly ensure the subtenant respects all lease rules (like no illegal or nuisance activities) to avoid putting the prime tenant in breach. A well-crafted sublease clause explains the scope of permitted subletting, the notice and consent procedure, and how the prime tenant might handle conflicts with the subtenant.
Insurance provisions can be critical in commercial leasing, safeguarding both landlord and tenant from catastrophic financial consequences. Typically, the landlord maintains property insurance covering the building’s structure against fire or major disasters, while the tenant secures a liability policy to cover accidents, injuries, or damage inside its premises. The lease often mandates a specific minimum coverage amount (like two million or five million dollars in liability) and demands the tenant add the landlord as an additional insured, protecting them if a visitor sues for a slip and fall. If the tenant stores valuable inventory or specialized equipment, it might carry property insurance for those contents. Meanwhile, certain leases incorporate co-insurance or specify who handles insurance for tenant improvements.
Without adequate coverage, a sudden calamity—like water damage from a burst pipe—could provoke disputes if the landlord’s policy does not cover tenant possessions or if the tenant’s negligence caused the incident. Clarity on subrogation waivers (ensuring the insurer does not sue the other party post-claim) also helps maintain goodwill. Annual evidence of policy renewals is typically demanded by the landlord, ensuring continuous coverage. If the tenant fails to keep insurance, that can be a breach leading to default notices or termination rights. Proper insurance clauses thus reduce uncertainty and keep both sides prepared for unforeseen events.
Beyond standard defaults like non-payment or violations of key covenants, certain circumstances allow early termination without the tenant being in breach. One scenario involves major property damage or expropriation by public authorities, making the premises unusable. The lease might state if partial damage occurs, the landlord must repair within a set period, but if the building is destroyed entirely, either party may terminate without penalty. Another scenario is the landlord’s redevelopment or demolition plan. Some commercial leases let the landlord serve a months-long notice that ends the term early, sometimes requiring compensation to cover the tenant’s relocation costs or improvements lost.
On the tenant side, special clauses might provide a co-tenancy or anchor tenant contingency—if a main draw (like a supermarket in a plaza) closes, smaller shops can terminate if traffic plummets. Alternatively, a newly introduced competitor in the same mall might let the existing tenant end the lease if exclusivity clauses are violated. Further, the contract might have a permit or zoning contingency: if the tenant fails to obtain a required occupancy licence, it can exit without damage claims. In all such cases, the CTA itself remains relatively silent, so the parties rely heavily on the negotiated text. If no path for early termination is set, negotiation or mutual agreement remains the only recourse. Thorough leases foresee these disruptions, creating frameworks for orderly and amicable dissolution if the business environment shifts radically.
Distress
Distress remains a distinctive remedy enabling a landlord to seize a tenant’s on-site assets (like equipment, inventory, or furniture) to recover overdue rent. The CTA imposes boundaries, such as requiring actual rent arrears and refraining from forcibly breaking in without the right conditions. A landlord that oversteps (seizing far more than the debt or ignoring partial payments made) risks claims for wrongful distress. If properly done, though, the landlord can store the seized goods for a specified period, allowing the tenant to pay the rent plus costs and reclaim them. If the tenant does not do so, the landlord can auction them, applying proceeds to the arrears. Distress is strong but can be overshadowed if the tenant’s goods are heavily financed or intangible. Moreover, once the landlord commences distress, they typically cannot simultaneously treat the lease as ended for that same default.
Action for Rent, Possession, or Re-Leasing
If the tenant simply refuses to pay or abandons the premises, the landlord might sue to recover unpaid rent or obtain a judgment. They can also physically re-enter (subject to the CTA’s rules) and re-let the unit. The lease commonly states that the landlord will mitigate damages by seeking a replacement occupant. If successful at an equal or higher rent, the old tenant’s liability for future rent might be reduced. If the new occupant pays less, the old tenant can remain liable for the difference. Some leases include an acceleration clause, making the entire balance of the term’s rent due upon default, but the landlord must still mitigate. Where a landlord obtains a court order confirming the tenant’s eviction, enforcement might be straightforward, but if the tenant has gone bankrupt, the landlord’s claim for unpaid rent typically becomes unsecured within the bankrupt estate, limiting recovery prospects.
Forfeiture and Relief
When the tenant breaches a fundamental covenant (like severely late rent, illegal use, or major damaging behaviour), the landlord might declare forfeiture of the lease, reclaiming the property. A notice often goes out first, offering the tenant a short cure period. If the tenant fails to fix matters or pay up, the landlord proceeds to re-enter. The CTA, however, allows the tenant to seek relief from forfeiture, especially if the default can be remedied quickly (like paying overdue sums plus costs). Courts favour giving a second chance if the tenant’s breach was not gross or repeated. On the other hand, if the tenant is consistently late or has inflicted major harm, the court can decline relief and let the landlord keep possession. Leases might define how many times the tenant can request relief or impose extra conditions (like a security deposit or personal guarantee) if they want to continue. By carefully outlining forfeiture triggers and steps in the contract, parties reduce confusion about the thresholds for re-entry or how the tenant can rectify a breach.
Other Remedies and Self-Help
Many commercial leases incorporate additional self-help powers for the landlord—like offsetting overdue rent against any sums it may owe the tenant (for instance, if the landlord is reimbursing the tenant for improvements). Alternatively, the landlord might use a security deposit to cover arrears or damage, though typically the deposit is finite. Tenants, for their part, can occasionally withhold rent or offset expenses if the landlord fails a major obligation—like refusing to fix a leaky roof that severely disrupts operations. The CTA and common law usually demand the tenant attempt less drastic solutions first, such as giving the landlord notice and a chance to remedy. In major disputes, commercial parties often resort to negotiation, mediation, or even arbitration to avoid a prolonged court fight. Clear drafting of the lease, combined with consistent communication, remains the most reliable approach to resolving friction before it escalates into eviction or litigation.
While discussions of commercial lease law often focus on the landlord’s enforcement powers, tenants do have potential recourses if the landlord fails essential obligations or engages in actions that significantly disrupt the tenant’s operations. Although Ontario’s Commercial Tenancies Act is not as comprehensive in this regard as residential legislation, certain principles and case law still offer meaningful protections for tenants:
Breach of Quiet Enjoyment
By default, a landlord is expected to permit the tenant to conduct its business free from unjustified interference. If the landlord’s conduct—such as repeated intrusion, disruption of services, or ignoring serious building defects—substantially impairs use of the premises, a tenant could claim a breach of the quiet enjoyment covenant. Depending on severity, courts may award damages, reduce rent obligations, or in extreme scenarios, allow the tenant to terminate the lease early.
Withholding Rent or Claiming Damages
If a landlord neglects major repairs essential to safe or functional occupancy—like fixing a structural roof leak—tenants can notify the landlord of the problem. If the landlord remains non-responsive, the tenant might consider withholding some rent to cover repair costs or seek damages for business losses. However, this step can be legally risky, as a landlord might treat unpaid rent as a default. Often, negotiation or mediation is more prudent before resorting to unilateral rent withholding.
Relief from Forfeiture
Although it arises primarily in eviction scenarios, relief from forfeiture can benefit a tenant if the landlord has already acted to terminate for alleged breach. If the tenant cures the default promptly, pays arrears, and covers the landlord’s reasonable costs, the court may reinstate the lease. This remedy is especially vital where a minor or one-time lapse triggered the landlord’s re-entry, giving the tenant a second chance to retain its premises.
Constructive Eviction Claims
In rare cases where the landlord’s failure to provide essential services (for example, heat, elevator maintenance, or utilities in an office tower) effectively forces the tenant to vacate, the tenant might argue constructive eviction. To succeed, they must show the landlord’s omission made the premises uninhabitable for the stated business use. If proven, the tenant can leave without ongoing liability and potentially seek damages for relocation or disruption expenses.
Legal Action and Offset Clauses
Tenants can sue the landlord for damages if significant harm arises from a landlord breach, such as failure to maintain common areas leading to clientele hazards. Some leases also allow a set-off or offset clause if the landlord defaults on obligations, although courts expect the tenant to follow contractual procedures and limit self-help measures unless the lease explicitly permits it.
Through careful lease drafting, tenants can strengthen their position with clear language on landlord maintenance duties, service standards, or remedies for unaddressed hazards. When issues arise, communicating concerns promptly and maintaining documentation (such as dated notices or photos of disrepair) can bolster a tenant’s stance. While tenant remedies in commercial contexts are not as robustly spelled out in statute as landlord powers, they can still provide a meaningful safety net when a landlord’s missteps or omissions undermine the tenant’s business.
If you’re involved in commercial leases, from drafting new agreements to resolving tenancy disputes, Grigoras Law offers meticulous guidance. Choose us for:
Disclaimer: The answers provided in this FAQ section are general in nature and should not be relied upon as formal legal advice. Each individual case is unique, and a separate analysis is required to address specific context and fact situations. For comprehensive guidance tailored to your situation, we welcome you to contact our expert team.
In Ontario, while an oral agreement might be valid at a general contract law level, it’s often risky for commercial leases. The Statute of Frauds (extended by certain provincial rules) typically requires any lease exceeding a year to be in writing. A purely verbal multi-year arrangement might be hard to enforce in court if disputes arise over rent amounts, renewal promises, or who pays for structural repairs. Landlords usually insist on a formal written document to lock in remedies if the tenant fails to pay, and likewise, tenants need clarity on the premises’ boundaries, permitted uses, or exit clauses.
Even if the occupant moves in and starts paying rent, a court might interpret their relationship as a periodic tenancy or monthly tenancy lacking the stable multi-year term. That uncertainty can hamper both parties—landlords might lose guaranteed rental revenue for the entire intended term, and tenants risk eviction with minimal notice. Meanwhile, conflicts about property taxes, insurance obligations, or maintenance can explode if not clarified in writing. In short, although a short oral arrangement might suffice for a few weeks or months, it’s not advisable for a more serious commercial venture. A properly drafted lease fosters a mutual understanding of rights and obligations—something harder to prove with handshake deals that rely on memory or conflicting testimonies.
If a tenant defaults on rent, the landlord can pursue multiple remedies. Initially, the landlord might serve a notice of default specifying the overdue rent and granting a short grace period to cure. If the tenant fails to pay, the landlord can proceed with distress, which lets them seize the tenant’s goods on-site and eventually auction them to recover arrears, subject to the Commercial Tenancies Act. Distress is powerful but must be used carefully—mistakes or seizing property beyond the arrears can expose the landlord to claims of wrongful distress. Meanwhile, once the landlord chooses distress, they typically cannot simultaneously terminate the lease for the same default.
If the landlord opts against distress or it’s not feasible (perhaps the tenant’s goods are intangible, or the landlord deems it too high-risk), they might sue the tenant in court for unpaid rent. After obtaining judgment, the landlord can enforce it by garnishing bank accounts or placing a writ on the tenant’s other assets. They can also serve a notice to terminate the lease, retake possession, and re-lease the premises. If the lease includes an acceleration clause, future rent for the remainder of the term might become immediately due—though courts often require the landlord to mitigate by attempting to find a replacement tenant. Ultimately, the best route depends on practicality: if the tenant truly lacks resources, collecting might prove difficult, urging the landlord to focus on repossessing the property and re-renting rather than chasing a potentially uncollectible judgment.
In many commercial leases, the landlord retains responsibility for structural repairs—like the foundation, major walls, roof, or load-bearing elements—since these are long-term building integrity issues. On the other hand, the tenant often takes care of internal upkeep (like painting, flooring, or minor fixtures) plus any specialized equipment they install. The exact division depends on how the lease is worded—some triple net agreements push most costs onto the tenant, including major structural maintenance or replacements. However, if structural damage is severe or related to the landlord’s design flaws, it is generally the landlord’s duty to fix it.
Common area maintenance (CAM) fees arise in multi-tenant complexes, shopping centres, or office towers, where the landlord aggregates costs for shared elements (hallways, lobbies, exterior landscaping, parking lots, snow removal, security) and apportions them among tenants. Typically, each tenant’s share is based on their proportionate share of the building’s total square footage. Over time, the landlord might adjust CAM fees if operating costs climb—like higher utility rates or security expansions. Disputes sometimes emerge when tenants suspect inflated or misallocated fees. Well-drafted leases detail how CAM budgets are calculated, whether overhead or administrative fees get included, and if annual reconciliations occur (crediting or billing tenants for over/under estimations). By clarifying these obligations upfront, landlords and tenants reduce friction and enjoy predictable cost allocations that align with each occupant’s usage of common amenities.
While many fundamental principles apply across all commercial leases, each sector (industrial, retail, office) can entail distinct operational nuances. For instance, industrial leases often revolve around warehousing, manufacturing, or distribution, which might require heavier power loads, loading docks, or environmental considerations if the tenant deals with chemicals or waste. Landlords frequently demand more stringent covenants related to hazard handling or specialized insurance coverage. Meanwhile, an industrial tenant typically invests in unique improvements—like installing large machinery—making the lease’s reinstatement or surrender obligations more detailed.
Retail leases, by contrast, place emphasis on foot traffic, signage rights, percentage rent clauses (especially in shopping centres), and potential co-tenancy or exclusivity clauses (like ensuring no direct competitor occupies the same plaza). Landlords in retail settings might meticulously manage brand mix or require certain operating hours. Office leases often address issues like building security protocols, elevator usage, or tenant improvements that respect building design. Additionally, sophisticated office leases may incorporate escalation clauses tied to CPI or define occupant density for efficient HVAC usage.
Though the Commercial Tenancies Act covers broad fundamentals, each sector’s standard leasing forms adapt to these differences. For example, a landlord might not mention co-tenancy in an industrial lease, but it’s a common retail concept. Ultimately, the underlying contract freedom remains wide, letting parties tailor covenants to reflect each industry’s operational realities and regulatory demands.
Unless the lease itself includes an early termination clause or the parties agree mutually, it’s difficult to end a fixed-term commercial lease prematurely without default or breach. A well-drafted agreement might provide for certain triggers—like building redevelopment or expropriation—for the landlord, or a “kick-out” option after a specified period if the tenant’s business underperforms. Similarly, the tenant might have a right to cancel if a major anchor tenant in a shopping centre leaves, significantly impacting foot traffic. Barring such clauses, a simple desire to relocate or switch premises typically isn’t justification to exit.
However, the parties can mutually negotiate an early surrender. The tenant might pay a lump-sum buyout to cover future rent or re-leasing costs, effectively compensating the landlord for lost income while the space is vacant. The landlord might accept if market conditions are favourable, allowing them to re-let at higher rent. All terms of the surrender should be documented in writing to avoid future disputes, releasing each side from obligations post-surrender date. If no agreement is reached, the tenant remains obligated to pay rent and meet lease duties, or risk default. Meanwhile, if the landlord tries to unilaterally repossess (absent a valid cause), the landlord could face wrongful termination claims. Clear contract drafting ensures known exit strategies, preventing forced occupancy or acrimonious standoffs.
Yes. While distress is a potent remedy allowing landlords to seize tenant chattels for overdue rent, the Commercial Tenancies Act imposes procedural checks. For instance, the landlord can only levy distress if rent is actually in arrears and must not seize goods after rent is paid. They typically need to act during the time the lease remains valid—if the lease is terminated first, distress is no longer an option. Additionally, the landlord cannot use force to enter the tenant’s premises or seize items forcibly if that contravenes the CTA. They must handle goods carefully: taking them in an excessive manner or overvaluing the arrears could expose the landlord to liability for wrongful distress.
Once distress is levied, the CTA outlines the timeline for storing items, notifying the tenant, and eventually auctioning them if the tenant fails to redeem by paying the overdue sum and related costs. If the landlord deviates from these steps or acts unreasonably (seizing items well beyond the debt’s value), a court may award damages to the tenant. Some leases override or refine the CTA’s default rules—for example, limiting or expanding the scope of property subject to distress—but these modifications must still respect overarching principles of fairness. As a result, wise landlords often consult legal counsel to confirm correct procedures, thereby reducing legal blowback or claims that the distress was improperly handled.
Yes, many commercial leases require a security deposit, usually collected at the lease’s inception to protect the landlord if the tenant defaults on rent or damages the premises. The deposit typically equals one or two months’ rent, but it can be higher if the tenant is relatively unknown or if improvements are expensive. The agreement should clarify whether the deposit can cover unpaid rent, cost of repair, or final adjustments. However, not all landlords automatically apply it to the “last month’s rent”—some prefer reserving it strictly for damages or shortfalls upon termination.
Because commercial tenancies are less regulated than residential ones, parties enjoy broad freedom to define deposit terms: how it is held, whether it bears interest, or if any portion is non-refundable for cleaning or administration. The deposit may also function as partial security if the tenant fails obligations like returning the space in “base building” condition. Meanwhile, once the lease ends smoothly and the tenant has paid all sums, the landlord refunds the deposit within the timeframe established in the contract. If the landlord tries to keep it unreasonably, the tenant can dispute. For clarity, the lease’s deposit clause should explicitly mention how it’s credited (like applying to final rent or offsetting damages) to avoid guesswork at lease expiry.
Grigoras Law provides smart, strategic counsel in civil litigation, business law, and appeals across Ontario.
Smart, Strategic Counsel.
GRIGORAS LAW - Civil Litigation and Business Lawyers Toronto © 2025 All Right Reserved
our team of experienced lawyers are at your service
