Director Liability: Consenting to and Voting for Certain Resolutions

In Ontario, under the Ontario Business Corporations Act, directors of a corporation have a legal responsibility to ensure that the corporation is financially stable before making certain transactions. This includes the payment of dividends, redemption or reacquisition of shares, reduction of stated capital, or provision of financial assistance to certain non-arm’s length persons.
The board of directors

In Ontario, under the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA), directors of a corporation have a legal responsibility to ensure that the corporation is financially stable before making certain transactions. This includes the payment of dividends, redemption or reacquisition of shares, reduction of stated capital, or provision of financial assistance to certain non-arm’s length persons. These transactions are generally forbidden if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the corporation would be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due, or that the value of its assets would be less than the aggregate of its liabilities and some or all of the stated capital or redemption or liquidation entitlement of its shares.

According to OBCA Section 130(2), if directors vote for or consent to a resolution authorizing any of the actions listed in clauses (b) to (f), which are contrary to OBCA Sections 30, 31, 32, 37, 38, 136, 185 or 248, they are jointly and severally liable to restore to the corporation any amounts so distributed or paid and not otherwise recovered by the corporation. This means that if a corporation’s directors authorize a dividend, for example, contrary to Section 38 of the OBCA, they are jointly and severally liable to restore the amount distributed or paid to the corporation if it is not otherwise recovered.

Furthermore, according to OBCA Section 130(3), a director who has satisfied a judgment rendered under this section is entitled to contribution from the other directors who voted for or consented to the unlawful act upon which the judgment was founded. A director liable under subsection (2) is entitled to apply to the court for an order compelling a shareholder or other recipient to pay or deliver to the director any money or property that was paid or distributed to the shareholder or other recipient contrary to OBCA Sections 30, 31, 32, 37, 38, 136, 185 or 248.

It’s worth noting that there are some exceptions in the OBCA that may allow for a defence against liability for the directors. According to OBCA Section 130(6), a director is not liable under subsection (1) if the director proves that he or she did not know and could not reasonably have known that the share was issued for a consideration less than the fair equivalent of the money that the corporation would have received if the share had been issued for money.

In summary, under the OBCA, directors of a corporation in Ontario have a legal responsibility to ensure that the corporation is financially stable before making certain transactions and may be held liable for any distributions that contravene the OBCA’s solvency tests. They may also be liable for restoring any amounts so distributed or paid and not otherwise recovered by the corporation. However, there are provisions in the OBCA that may allow for a defence against liability for the directors if they can demonstrate that they did not know and could not reasonably have known about the circumstances that led to the liability.

Share:

More Posts

Screen displaying social media platform icons representing online platform liability for defamatory reviews in Canadian law

Can You Sue Google for a Defamatory Review? What Canadian Law Says

A false review on Google Maps can reach thousands of people and stay there indefinitely. The person behind it may be anonymous and untraceable. Can you sue Google instead? Recent Canadian decisions in Thorpe v. Boakye and Jeffery v. Almusslat suggest the answer is increasingly yes, where the platform had notice, had control, and chose not to act.

What Every Director Needs to Know: Board Governance and Legal Obligations in Canada

The board of directors sits at the centre of Canadian corporate governance, bearing ultimate legal responsibility for how a corporation is managed. This article covers the statutory requirements for board composition, the meaning of director independence, what powers the board can and cannot delegate, and how unanimous shareholders’ agreements redistribute duties and liabilities between directors and shareholders.

Rows of bankers boxes on shelves representing third-party document disclosure in a Norwich Order application

Unmasking the Wrongdoer: Norwich Orders in Canadian Civil Litigation

When you know a wrong has been committed but cannot identify who did it, ordinary civil procedure offers no path forward. The Norwich Order fills that gap. It compels a third party mixed up in wrongdoing to disclose information before proceedings start, allowing a victim to identify a wrongdoer, trace stolen assets, or confirm whether a cause of action exists. This article explains the test, the limits, and how the remedy works in practice.

Pinocchio's nose growing as a metaphor for fraud by silence and concealment in Canadian law

What You Don’t Say: Fraudulent Concealment and the Duty to Disclose in Canadian Law

Silence is generally not fraud — but in a meaningful range of circumstances it is, and the consequences are identical to an outright lie. This article explains when Canadian courts will find that a party’s failure to speak is actionable fraud, what duty to disclose arises and from what relationships, how half-truths are treated, and how fraudulent concealment can suspend limitation periods that would otherwise bar a claim.

Confidential consultation

09000 00000

65 Queen Street west, Suite 1240, toronto, Ontario M5H 2M5

Requeast a Consulastion

our team of experienced lawyers are at your service