The tort of Unlawful Interference With Economic Relations, also known as Intentional Interference With Economic Relations, is an important consideration in business law and commercial litigation. It addresses scenarios where a third party’s unlawful actions intentionally cause economic harm to another party. Understanding this tort involves comprehending the nature of unlawful means, the necessary elements to establish the tort, the available remedies, and potential defences. The below overview will provide insight into these aspects to aid clients in navigating legal challenges in business contexts.
Unlawful interference with economic relations is a tort available in three-party situations where the defendant (D) commits an unlawful act against a third party (T), which intentionally causes economic harm to the plaintiff (P). This tort is not applicable to two-party situations, which are better addressed by other torts such as intimidation or breach of contract.
The tort is primarily applicable in scenarios involving three parties:
“Unlawful means” refers to actions that are illegal or wrongful and can be the basis for a civil cause of action. This includes acts that:
Unlawful means must be directed at a third party and result in harm to the plaintiff. The actions taken by the defendant need to be more than just unfair or unethical; they must be illegal or wrongful in a manner that they would support a legal claim if brought by the third party.
The unlawful means requirement is particularly nuanced. For instance, while mere ethical breaches or competitive conduct may not suffice, actions that are illegal, such as fraud or physical obstruction, clearly fall within this ambit. Additionally, the illegal act must interfere with the third party’s ability to deal with the plaintiff, thus causing harm to the plaintiff. This distinguishes the tort from other forms of economic interference that may not involve illegal acts.
To successfully establish a case for unlawful interference with economic relations, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:
Intent to Injure: It is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant’s predominant purpose was to injure. It is sufficient that the unlawful act was directed at the plaintiff in some measure. This intent requirement does not include incidental or foreseeable consequences but must be a deliberate action aimed at causing harm.
The intent can often be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the defendant’s actions. Courts will consider factors such as the nature of the defendant’s conduct, the directness of the harm to the plaintiff, and any previous interactions between the parties that suggest a motive to harm.
Interference by Unlawful Means: The unlawful means must involve an act that the defendant is not legally permitted to commit, which affects the third party, leading to the plaintiff’s economic harm. This element is crucial and involves actions that could include tortious acts or breaches of statutory obligations.
The scope of unlawful means is broad and can encompass any illegal action that interferes with the third party’s freedom to deal with the plaintiff. This includes both direct actions, such as coercing a third party, and indirect actions, such as spreading false information to disrupt a business relationship.
Economic Loss: The plaintiff must demonstrate actual economic loss or harm resulting from the defendant’s actions. This loss should be directly attributable to the interference caused by the unlawful means employed by the defendant.
Economic loss must be quantifiable and directly linked to the defendant’s actions. The plaintiff must show a clear causal connection between the unlawful act and the economic harm suffered. This often involves detailed financial records and expert testimony to establish the extent of the damages.
The remedies for unlawful interference with economic relations can include:
Compensatory Damages: To cover the actual economic loss suffered. These damages aim to put the plaintiff in the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred.
The calculation of compensatory damages involves assessing the full impact of the unlawful interference on the plaintiff’s business. This includes immediate financial losses and projected future losses that can be attributed to the defendant’s actions.
Punitive Damages: In cases where the defendant’s conduct is deemed particularly egregious or malicious, punitive damages may be awarded. These damages are intended to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future.
Punitive damages are not awarded in every case and require a high threshold of proof. The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s actions were not only unlawful but also carried out with a level of malice or reckless disregard for the plaintiff’s rights.
Injunctive Relief: To prevent further unlawful interference. Injunctive relief is a court order that requires the defendant to cease the unlawful activities.
Injunctive relief can be crucial in preventing ongoing or future harm. Temporary injunctions provide quick relief, while permanent injunctions ensure long-term protection against unlawful interference.
Two primary defences can be used against a claim of unlawful interference with economic relations:
Justification: The defendant may argue that their actions were justified under the circumstances. This can involve demonstrating a legitimate business interest or legal right that necessitated the actions in question.
The defence of justification requires the defendant to show that their actions were necessary and proportionate to achieving a legitimate aim. This involves balancing the defendant’s rights and interests against the harm caused to the plaintiff.
Absence of Intent: The defendant can contend that there was no intent to injure the plaintiff. This defence focuses on the lack of deliberate intent to cause economic harm, which is a required element for establishing the tort.
Absence of intent can be challenging to prove, as it requires a detailed examination of the defendant’s motives and the context of their actions. Courts will look for evidence that supports the claim that the harm to the plaintiff was an unintended side effect of otherwise lawful conduct.
Navigating the complexities of Unlawful Interference With Economic Relations is essential for protecting your business interests and ensuring fair competition. When facing issues related to this tort, having the right legal representation can make all the difference. For businesses in Toronto and throughout Ontario, Grigoras Law stands out as the top choice for handling these intricate cases.
Protecting your business’s economic interests is vital in today’s market. When facing issues related to unlawful interference with economic relations, seek the expert guidance of Grigoras Law. We are here to represent you, providing the strong advocacy and legal expertise required to manage your legal challenges. Take control of your situation confidently, knowing that you have a dedicated and proficient legal team by your side.
If you believe your business has been a victim of unlawful interference with economic relations or if you are facing allegations of such conduct, reach out to our experienced Toronto commercial litigation lawyers. We represent clients throughout Ontario with personalized solutions tailored to meet your unique needs. Choose Grigoras Law for a dedicated and skilled legal team ready to support you at every step. We are committed to providing top-tier professional service, ensuring every detail of your case receives expert attention.
At Grigoras Law, we understand the significant impact that unlawful interference with economic relations can have on your business. Our commitment to excellence, client-focused approach, and proven success make us the ideal choice for your legal needs. Trust us to protect your business interests and provide the robust legal support necessary to navigate these complex challenges.
Disclaimer: The answers provided in this FAQ section are general in nature and should not be relied upon as formal legal advice. Each individual case is unique, and a separate analysis is required to address specific context and fact situations. For comprehensive guidance tailored to your situation, we welcome you to contact our expert team.
Unlawful interference with economic relations, also known as intentional interference with economic relations, is a tort that addresses situations where a third party’s unlawful actions intentionally cause economic harm to another party. This tort is specifically applicable in three-party situations where the defendant (D) commits an unlawful act against a third party (T), which in turn causes economic harm to the plaintiff (P).
The nature of the unlawful act can vary and may include tortious conduct such as defamation, criminal activities such as fraud, or breaches of statutory duties. The key element is that the defendant’s actions must be illegal or wrongful in a way that would support a legal claim if brought by the third party. The unlawful act must interfere with the third party’s ability to deal with the plaintiff, leading to economic harm for the plaintiff.
To establish a case for unlawful interference with economic relations, the plaintiff must prove three main elements: intent to injure, interference by unlawful means, and economic loss. The intent requirement does not necessitate proving that the defendant’s predominant purpose was to harm the plaintiff; it is sufficient that the unlawful act was directed at the plaintiff in some way. The economic loss must be directly attributable to the defendant’s unlawful actions.
This tort is complex and requires a nuanced understanding of both the legal and factual elements involved. Legal representation is crucial to navigate the intricacies of this area of law, whether you are seeking to bring a claim or defending against one.
“Unlawful means” in the context of unlawful interference with economic relations refers to actions that are illegal or wrongful and can form the basis of a civil cause of action. These actions must interfere with the third party’s ability to deal with the plaintiff, resulting in economic harm to the plaintiff. Here are some common examples:
Tortious Acts: These include defamation, inducing breach of contract, or interference with contractual relations. For instance, if a defendant spreads false information about a plaintiff’s business, causing a supplier to terminate their contract, this constitutes unlawful means.
Criminal Acts: Activities such as blackmail, fraud, or physical sabotage fall under this category. An example would be if a competitor uses threats of violence to coerce a third party into ceasing business with the plaintiff.
Statutory Breaches: Violations of laws or regulations designed to protect economic relations can also be considered unlawful means. This might involve breaches of trade regulations or anti-competition laws that result in economic harm to the plaintiff.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty: When an individual in a fiduciary position breaches their duty, causing harm to the plaintiff’s economic interests, this can also constitute unlawful means. An example could be a director of a company who uses insider information to benefit a competitor at the expense of the plaintiff’s business.
The critical aspect of “unlawful means” is that the defendant’s actions must be more than just unfair or unethical; they must be illegal or wrongful to the extent that they would support a legal claim by the third party if pursued. Understanding what constitutes unlawful means is essential for both plaintiffs and defendants in these cases, and legal advice is crucial to navigate this complex area of law.
To establish a claim for unlawful interference with economic relations, a plaintiff must prove three essential elements: intent to injure, interference by unlawful means, and economic loss. Each of these elements plays a critical role in substantiating the claim.
Intent to Injure: The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant intended to cause economic harm. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant’s predominant motive was to injure the plaintiff; rather, it suffices if the unlawful act was directed at the plaintiff with some degree of intent to harm. This intent can be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the defendant’s actions.
Interference by Unlawful Means: The plaintiff must show that the defendant interfered with their economic relations through unlawful means. This involves illegal or wrongful actions such as defamation, fraud, or breach of statutory duties. The unlawful act must interfere with a third party’s ability to deal with the plaintiff, leading to economic harm.
Economic Loss: The plaintiff must prove that they suffered actual economic loss as a direct result of the defendant’s unlawful interference. This includes quantifiable financial damages such as lost profits, increased operational costs, or loss of business opportunities. The plaintiff must establish a clear causal link between the defendant’s actions and the economic harm suffered.
Proving these elements requires a thorough examination of the facts, detailed evidence, and often expert testimony to establish the extent of the economic loss. Legal representation is crucial in effectively presenting a case for unlawful interference with economic relations, ensuring that all necessary elements are clearly demonstrated and supported by evidence.
When a claim for unlawful interference with economic relations is successful, several remedies may be available to the plaintiff. These remedies aim to compensate for the economic loss suffered and deter future unlawful conduct by the defendant. The primary remedies include compensatory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief.
Compensatory Damages: These damages are awarded to cover the actual economic loss suffered by the plaintiff. They aim to restore the plaintiff to the position they would have been in had the unlawful interference not occurred. Compensatory damages can include:
Punitive Damages: In cases where the defendant’s conduct is particularly egregious or malicious, punitive damages may be awarded. These are intended to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future. Punitive damages are not awarded in every case and require proof of willful and malicious intent to harm the plaintiff.
Injunctive Relief: This is a court order requiring the defendant to cease the unlawful activities. Injunctive relief can be critical in preventing further harm and can take two forms:
These remedies are designed to address the harm caused by unlawful interference comprehensively, ensuring that the plaintiff receives adequate compensation and protection against future interference. Legal representation is essential in effectively securing these remedies, as it involves presenting a compelling case supported by evidence and legal arguments.
Defending against a claim of unlawful interference with economic relations involves several potential defences that can mitigate or nullify the allegations. Two primary defences are justification and the absence of intent.
Justification: The defendant can argue that their actions were justified under the circumstances. This defence can involve demonstrating that the actions taken were necessary to protect legitimate business interests or to exercise legal rights. For example:
Absence of Intent: The defendant can argue that there was no intent to injure the plaintiff. This defence focuses on demonstrating that the harm to the plaintiff was not intentional. The defendant must show that their actions were accidental or incidental and not directed towards causing harm. For example:
Successfully asserting these defences requires a detailed understanding of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case. Legal representation is crucial in effectively presenting these defences, as it involves a thorough examination of the evidence and crafting compelling legal arguments to counter the plaintiff’s claims.
Grigoras Law provides smart, strategic counsel in civil litigation, business law, and appeals across Ontario.
Smart, Strategic Counsel.
GRIGORAS LAW - Civil Litigation and Business Lawyers Toronto © 2025 All Right Reserved
our team of experienced lawyers are at your service
