A curated hub of legal analysis, practical guides, and timely updates from Grigoras Law—written for clients, professionals, and the public.
Grigoras Law’s Information Portal gathers plain-language explainers, case commentaries, and practice notes across
civil litigation, commercial litigation, business law, appeals, and select cross-border topics (including international
and Nevada matters). We focus on practical takeaways, Ontario procedure, and timely developments—so you can move
from reading to action with confidence.
[W]hat happens if you do not file the statement of claim (Form 14D) within thirty days after the notice of action is issued, and you cannot get the defendant’s written consent to file it? Failure to file the statement of claim within 30 days of the notice of action being filed does not render the action a nullity.
Effective January 1, 2023, Ontario corporations governed by the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) will be required to maintain a register of individuals with significant control. This change is the result of Bill 43, which the government of Ontario approved in 2021.
The Consumer Protection Act, 2002 (“CPA”) is a piece of legislation in Ontario that was put in place to safeguard customers’ interests in their interactions with various commercial enterprises. If a consumer’s rights are infringed upon, it details the legal recourses available to them as well as the rights and responsibilities of both businesses and customers.
There is a federal law in Canada called the Investment Canada Act, and it is used to govern the flow of foreign investment into the country. At the federal level, this legislation is the only one regulating foreign investment in the country.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Saadati fundamentally altered the way in which tort law responds to mental injury by attempting to align it more closely with the way it sponds to physical injuries. In this particular case, the Court upheld a trial judge’s award for Mr. Saadati’s mental injury, despite the absence of a diagnosis of a recognized psychiatric illness.
The Court of Appeal in Owsinik provided further clarity on the first element of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion: the state of mind requirement. The prohibited state of mind, whether intention or recklessness, must exist when the defendant engages in the prohibited conduct.
Found this article helpful? When it’s time to act, our team handles civil, commercial, and appellate work across Ontario (and select cross-border matters). Clear strategy, responsive service, and focused advocacy—start with a brief intake.
our team of experienced lawyers are at your service