Understanding Spousal Support: Key Elements

Denis Grigoras

Denis is a lawyer who draws on his background in complex legal disputes and transactions to problem-solve for his clients.

In family law, spousal support is central to helping spouses who have become financially disadvantaged due to the breakdown of a marriage or common-law relationship. This post examines the legal principles and case law surrounding spousal support, discussing child support priority, general principles, and various factors that influence support amounts and duration.

Share Post:

Spousal Support


In family law, spousal support is central to helping spouses who have become financially disadvantaged due to the breakdown of a marriage or common-law relationship. This post examines the legal principles and case law surrounding spousal support, discussing child support priority, general principles, and various factors that influence support amounts and duration. Understanding these principles can help you navigate the complexities of spousal support in family law.

Priority to Child Support

According to Section 38.1(1) of the Family Law Act (“FLA”), child support takes precedence over spousal or same-sex partner support. Courts must document the reasons if prioritizing child support reduces or eliminates spousal support. Significant changes in child support may necessitate revisiting spousal support decisions, and the standard two-year limitation for spousal support applications is not applicable in these situations.

General Principles

The FLA’s spousal support principles resemble those of the Divorce Act, considering factors such as needs, income, assets, self-sufficiency, relationship duration, lump-sum payment, and written agreements. Courts are instructed by paragraph 33(8) of the FLA to acknowledge contributions, share child support burdens, aid in self-support, and alleviate financial hardship when determining support orders. These principles apply to both the Divorce Act and provincial legislation, as confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Bracklow v. Bracklow.

Moge v. Moge

The Supreme Court of Canada established a compensatory model for spousal support in the 1992 case of Moge v. Moge, extending criteria beyond need and capacity to pay. Under the Divorce Act, courts must consider four objectives: (a) acknowledging economic advantages/disadvantages stemming from the marriage/breakdown, (b) allocating financial consequences from childcare, (c) alleviating economic hardship, and (d) promoting economic self-sufficiency when feasible. No single objective is paramount, and being married does not guarantee support. The goal is to address the disadvantaged spouse’s economic losses as fully as possible, considering the payor’s ability. Equitable distribution can be achieved through spousal/child support and property division. Moge transformed spousal support law, generally resulting in higher amounts and longer durations.

Bracklow v. Bracklow

In the 1999 case of Bracklow v. Bracklow, the Supreme Court of Canada identified three statutory bases for spousal support: contractual, compensatory, and non-compensatory. Factors such as agreements, financial circumstances, and self-sufficiency must be considered. In this case, Mrs. Bracklow received support due to the length of cohabitation, hardship, need, and her husband’s ability to pay. Compensatory support addresses economic disadvantages arising from marriage or its breakdown, while non-compensatory support recognizes interdependence and the potential need for support after marriage.

Quantum/Amount and Duration

Spousal support orders can be time-limited or indefinite, depending on factors like the length of the marriage, the presence of children, and each party’s ability to work. Support payments may be periodic or a lump sum. Courts consider various circumstances outlined in section 33(9) of the FLA, including assets, means, capacity to support, age, health, standard of living, career contributions, childcare responsibilities, cohabitation length, and other legal rights to support. Section 33(9)(m) clarifies that this list is not exhaustive.

In Climans v. Latner, a case involving a 14-year relationship with an opulent lifestyle and separate residences, the lower court determined the parties were “spouses” under section 29 of the FLA and granted spousal support. However, the Court of Appeal determined that the trial judge incorrectly applied the “rule of 65” for indefinite support, as the requirement of cohabiting in the first five months of the relationship was not met. The Court of Appeal reversed the indefinite support order and capped it at 10 years, following the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines range of seven to 14 years.

Lump Sum Payments

In some cases, parties may agree or the court may order spousal support to be paid as a lump sum, rather than periodic payments. A lump sum payment represents the present value of the total spousal support obligation, paid in one installment. This approach can provide both parties with financial certainty and may help the recipient achieve financial independence more quickly.

There are several factors to consider when determining whether a lump sum payment is appropriate, including the financial circumstances of both parties, the tax implications of the payment, and the feasibility of making such a payment. It is essential to carefully assess these factors and consult with a knowledgeable family law professional to determine if a lump sum payment is appropriate in a particular case.

Impact of a Party’s New Relationship

The existence of a new relationship for either the payor or the recipient of spousal support can have an impact on the determination of spousal support. Generally, a new relationship may affect the recipient’s need for support or the payor’s ability to pay.

If the recipient enters a new relationship and begins cohabiting with a new partner, the court may consider the new partner’s financial contributions and reassess the recipient’s need for spousal support. This could result in a reduction or termination of spousal support payments, depending on the circumstances. However, each case is unique, and the court will consider various factors, such as the duration and financial arrangements of the new relationship, before making any adjustments to the spousal support order.

On the other hand, if the payor enters a new relationship, the court may consider the new partner’s financial resources in assessing the payor’s ability to pay spousal support. However, it is important to note that the payor’s primary obligation is to their former spouse, and the court will not allow the payor to avoid their spousal support obligations by voluntarily choosing to support a new partner.

Variation of Support Orders

Spousal support orders can be varied if there is a material change in circumstances. This may include changes in the financial situation of either party, the emergence of health issues, or a change in childcare responsibilities. The court has the authority to modify, suspend, or terminate spousal support orders as it deems appropriate in response to these changes.

Termination of Support

Spousal support can be terminated upon the death of either party, the remarriage of the recipient, or in cases where the court deems that the recipient is now self-sufficient. A court may also set a specific end date for spousal support payments in the original order, depending on the circumstances of the case.

Impact of Taxes

Spousal support payments are considered taxable income for the recipient and tax-deductible for the payor. This tax treatment may have implications on the net amount of spousal support received or paid. Parties should consider the tax implications when negotiating spousal support agreements, and the court may take these factors into account when determining the appropriate amount of support.

Enforcement of Support Orders

Spousal support orders can be enforced through the Family Responsibility Office (“FRO”) in Ontario. The FRO has the authority to take various measures to ensure compliance with support orders, such as garnishing wages, suspending driver’s licenses, or initiating legal proceedings against the non-compliant party.

Understanding the Time Limits for Seeking Spousal Support

In the case of Kyle v. Atwill, the Court of Appeal discussed the interplay between the Limitations Act and the Family Law Act in determining limitation periods for spousal support (and equalization claims). The Court of Appeal acknowledged that, in most cases, the limitation periods provided in the family law context are more generous than the two-year period set out in s. 4 of the Limitations Act, due to the unique circumstances surrounding the dissolution of a marriage.

Section 19(1)(a) of the Limitations Act allows for the application of limitation periods contained in other acts, such as the Family Law Act. For equalization of net family property, s. 7(3) of the Family Law Act outlines three limitation periods for applications. Unlike the Limitations Act, the court may extend limitation periods provided in the Family Law Act under s. 2(8) of that Act in certain circumstances.

Regarding spousal support, the Family Law Act does not provide a limitation period for seeking an order under s. 33(1). Instead, s. 16(1)(c) of the Limitations Act establishes that there is no limitation period for bringing a proceeding to obtain support or enforce a support contract under the Family Law Act. This accounts for the need to allow spouses more time to resolve property issues and address changing support needs.

The Court of Appeal also examined limitation periods for setting aside domestic contracts, such as marriage contracts under s. 52 of the Family Law Act. The Family Law Act includes provisions that allow a court to set aside all or part of a marriage contract in certain situations, as outlined in s. 33(4) and s. 56(4). However, no limitation period is provided in the Family Law Act for setting aside a domestic contract under s. 56(4) or a spousal support provision of a marriage contract under s. 33(4).

Since the Family Law Act is silent on the limitation period for an application to set aside a marriage contract under s. 56(4), the court must look to the Limitations Act to determine the applicable provisions. The Court of Appeal in Kyle v. Atwill rejected the view that the limitation period for equalization should also apply to an application to set aside a marriage contract under s. 56(4) of the Family Law Act. Instead, the absence of a limitation period in the Family Law Act for this action indicates that the Limitations Act should apply.


Spousal support is a complex area of family law, with many factors influencing the determination of entitlement, amount, and duration. Understanding the legal principles, relevant statutes, and case law can provide valuable insight into the potential outcomes of a spousal support case. If you are facing a spousal support issue, it is essential to consult with a knowledgeable family law lawyer to navigate this challenging legal landscape.

Spousal support aims to address the economic consequences of a relationship breakdown, taking into account various factors such as the needs and means of each party, the duration of the relationship, and the contributions made by each spouse. As illustrated by the cases discussed in this blog post, the courts will assess these factors on a case-by-case basis, considering the unique circumstances of each couple. It is crucial for anyone involved in a spousal support dispute to seek legal advice from an experienced family law lawyer to ensure a fair and equitable outcome.

Stay Connected

More Posts

False Light

Shedding Light on the False Light Tort

In 2019, Ontario recognized “publicity which places an individual in a false light” – the “false light tort” – as a part of the common law. Despite its relatively straightforward definition, the false light tort remains puzzling due to its ambiguous parameters, unique elements, and potential utility.

Read More »
Canadian Taxation for Athletes

Extra Points: The Game of Canadian Taxation for Athletes

How does Canadian tax law impact professional athletes? To understand this, we need to think about multiple scenarios, and consider the athlete’s residency, their affiliations with Canadian or foreign-based teams, and the ever-changing political landscape surrounding the taxation of sports franchises in Canada.

Read More »
Airline Baggage and Cargo Liability

When Bags Fly: Airline Baggage and Cargo Liability

When your cargo or luggage gets damaged or lost during international air transport, you might think that the airline will compensate you for your losses. However, the legal landscape surrounding airline liability for international cargo and baggage is complex. It’s governed by international conventions like the Warsaw Convention and the Montreal Convention, which establish specific rules and liability limits for airlines.

Read More »
Business Judgment Rule

The Business Judgment Rule: A Director’s Guide to Risky Business

The business judgment rule has its roots firmly planted in the need to facilitate an environment of innovation and growth in business. Recognizing that running a business often involves taking risks, this rule has been developed to shield directors and officers who are willing to take calculated chances to propel a corporation forward.

Read More »
Civil Fraud

Civil Fraud: The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Civil fraud, also known as deceit, is a serious economic tort or civil wrong that involves a deliberate deception through false representation. It requires four elements: a false representation by the defendant, their knowledge (or recklessness) of the falsehood, the plaintiff’s action influenced by this representation, and a loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result.

Read More »
Nevada's Court System

Silver State Justice: A Closer Look at Nevada’s Court System

The judicial system in Nevada plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring the fair administration of justice. The courts covered include Municipal Courts, Justice Courts, Small Claims Court, District Courts, Family Courts, and Appellate Courts, comprising the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Read More »
Insider Trading

Insider Intel: Navigating the Gray Areas of Insider Trading

An “insider” is broadly defined, including the corporation, directors, officers, major shareholders, employees, and professionals like lawyers or accountants. Liability extends to those receiving confidential information from insiders (tippees). Insiders cannot tip others for trading advantages. If an insider tips an unrelated person, they are liable for damages and accountable to the corporation for benefits received.

Read More »
Will Large Language Models Like ChatGPT Replace Legal Professionals

Will Large Language Models Like ChatGPT Replace Legal Professionals?

In recent months, the rise of advanced artificial intelligence and natural language processing technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, has sparked a debate about their potential impact on various industries, including the legal profession. The million-dollar question inevitably arises: Will LLMs replace lawyers (and perhaps judges also), or at the very least, lead to a massive paradigm shift in law practice?

Read More »
Apologies and Retractions

Sorry, Not Sorry: Apologies & Retractions in Defamation Law

In defamation cases, an apology may play a crucial role in the assessment of damages. However, it is important to note that courts lack the jurisdiction to order defendants to apologize. The existence of an apology, the sincerity of the defendant, and the extent of the publicity given to the apology are factors that courts consider when determining damages.

Read More »
Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule

Tracing Commingled Funds: Unraveling the LIBR Mystery

The Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule (“LIBR“) is an essential concept in the legal world, particularly in cases involving the tracing of funds. It is an evidential rule that assumes that when a person commingles their own funds with funds belonging to someone else, they are assumed to have spent their own funds first.

Read More »
Suing a City

Suing a City: Abuse of Power Lawsuits

Yes, believe it or not, you can sue a city. Municipal corporations, which include cities, are no longer immune to liability as they were in the past. They can be held accountable for various wrongdoings, such as tortious acts, breaches of contract, and neglecting statutory duties.

Read More »
Rylands v. Fletcher

Taming the Tort: The Lasting Impact of Rylands v. Fletcher

Rylands v. Fletcher is a landmark case in English tort law that established the principle of strict liability for certain harmful activities. The rule states that a person who uses their land for non-natural purposes and accumulates a potentially dangerous substance on their property may be held strictly liable if that substance escapes and causes damage to another’s property.

Read More »
Notice Requirements Defamation

The Fine Print: Notice Requirements in Ontario Defamation Law

In Ontario, special notice requirements apply to defamation cases involving libel in a newspaper printed and published in the province or a broadcast from a station within Ontario. Plaintiffs must provide written notice to the defendant within six weeks after becoming aware of the alleged libel.

Read More »

The Battle for Chattel: Understanding the Tort of Conversion

The tort of conversion primarily deals with the unlawful interference of another person’s movable personal property, known as chattels. In contrast to trespass to goods, conversion demands more than just a simple invasion of the plaintiff’s possessory rights; it necessitates an interference that denies the plaintiff’s title.

Read More »

The Principal Residence Exemption

The term “principal residence” refers to a taxpayer’s primary dwelling or housing unit for a specific tax year. The taxpayer, their spouse, common-law partner, former spouse, or child must ordinarily inhabit the residence. A personal trust can also claim a principal residence if it is regularly occupied by a specified beneficiary or their immediate family.

Read More »

From Threats to Torts: The Law on Intimidation

The tort of intimidation, a relatively less explored area of common law, has been recognized and established through a series of judicial decisions. The House of Lords in Rookes v. Barnard (“Rookes“) formally acknowledged the existence of this tort, which has since been accepted as part of the common law in Canada.

Read More »
Shareholder Loans

Navigating the Tax Maze: How Shareholder Loans Impact Your Taxes

According to Section 15(2) of the Income Tax Act, a shareholder (or a person or partnership connected to the shareholder) may be deemed to have received a taxable benefit equal to the amount of a loan or debt made by a corporation. This taxable benefit is included in the shareholder’s income for the tax year in which the loan or debt arose.

Read More »
Are Internet Communications Broadcasts

Digital Dilemmas: Are Internet Communications Considered Broadcasts in Canadian Defamation Law?

Over time, Canadian provincial legislation regulating defamation has been updated to incorporate modern communication methods. However, since most of this legislation does not explicitly address the Internet, judges are often required to draw parallels between Internet communications and traditional media forms, such as newspapers and broadcasts, that are covered by the legislation.

Read More »
I Was Sued

I Was Sued – Now What? (A Step-by-Step Guide)

Litigation is a complex process that requires careful attention to detail and a thorough understanding of the rules and procedures that govern the legal system. In this blog post, we explore the various stages of a lawsuit in Ontario, from the initial pleadings to the final trial.

Read More »
Class Action Certification

All for One, and One for All: A Blueprint for Success in Class Action Certification in Canada

In the Canadian legal landscape, class actions represent a powerful mechanism for individuals who have suffered similar harm or losses to collectively seek legal redress against a common defendant. These lawsuits serve multiple purposes, such as providing access to justice for people who might not have the means to pursue individual litigation, encouraging behavioural modification in large corporations or organizations, and promoting judicial efficiency by consolidating numerous related cases into a single legal action.

Read More »
Creating a Shareholders' Agreement

Share the Love, Not the Drama: A Guide to Creating an Effective Shareholders’ Agreement

An essential contract for small non-offering corporations, shareholders’ agreements define the rights, privileges, liabilities, and responsibilities of each shareholder. These agreements, also known as “unanimous shareholders’ agreements,” offer a framework to govern various aspects of a corporation’s functioning, such as delineating shareholder roles, placing limitations on certain actions, and regulating share transfers.

Read More »
Insurance Policies for Business Owners

Smart Insurance Choices: 8 Must-Have Policies for Ontario Business Owners

Running a successful business in Ontario requires dedication, hard work, and a thorough understanding of the various types of insurance available to protect your company’s assets and interests. In this overview, we will explore the ins and outs of the eight different insurance options available to Ontario-based businesses, helping you make informed decisions about the coverage your business needs to thrive.

Read More »
Passing Off

The Blurred Lines of Business: Tackling the Tort of Passing Off

The tort of passing off in Canadian law is founded upon the notion that no individual should be allowed to represent their products or services as those of another. The Supreme Court of Canada has set forth three key elements that a plaintiff must establish to succeed in a passing off action: goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage.

Read More »
Discontinue an Action

When Can You Discontinue an Action in Ontario?

When a plaintiff wants to discontinue an action against a defendant before the close of pleadings in Ontario, they have the right to do so by serving a Notice of Discontinuance on all parties served with a statement of claim and filing the notice with proof of service in the registrar’s office.

Read More »
The Proper Law of Contract

The Proper Law of a Contract: Two-Stage Inquiry Explained

The “proper law” of a contract generally governs most issues pertaining to its validity, interpretation, performance, and breach in the context of the Anglo-Canadian conflict of laws. The “proper law” rule is based on the principle that parties to a contract are free to choose the governing law.

Read More »
PIPEDA Demystified

PIPEDA Demystified: A Simple Overview of Data Privacy for Businesses and Individuals

In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (the “PIPEDA”) is a federal law regulating the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by private organizations during commercial activities. The PIPEDA is key legislation that aims to safeguard the privacy of individuals by setting out clear rules for the management of personal information by private organizations.

Read More »
Promissory Estoppel

Promissory Estoppel: The Exception to Consideration in Contract Law

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that may be used to prevent a party from reneging on a promise or representation they have made. It is a principle of equity that can be invoked to prevent a party from relying on their strict legal rights where it would be unfair or unjust to do so. Although originally developed by the common law, it has been modified over time by equitable principles.

Read More »
Dirty Money in the Gambling Industry - Canadian Regulations

The Fight Against Dirty Money in the Gambling Industry: An Overview of Canadian Regulations

The gambling industry is a prime target for those seeking to launder illegal funds. This includes physical casinos, online casinos, bars with poker machines, and both physical and online sports betting services. The global gambling industry generated record-breaking revenues in 2021, reaching $261 billion (USD) in the US and €87.2 billion (EUR) in Europe, making it an attractive option for criminals seeking to launder money. Relative to population size, Canada’s gambling industry made a proportional $2.64 billion (CAD) in revenue in 2021.

Read More »
Affidavits in the Legal System

Making a Statement: The Role of Affidavits in the Legal System

An affidavit is a document used in legal proceedings that comprises a witness’s statement of facts or opinion. The witness attests to the document, and the affidavit is taken by an authorized individual. This individual, known as the commissioner, confirms the witness’s identity and delivers the oath or affirmation that the document’s contents are accurate. The witness, not the commissioner, is responsible for determining the statement’s truth.

Read More »
Voiding a Contract

Voiding a Contract: Understanding the Different Options

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that outlines their respective rights and obligations. But what happens if one of the parties wants to get out of the contract? In some cases, a contract can be voided, which means that it is deemed to have never existed legally.

Read More »
The Power of Reliance

The Power of Reliance: Making Promises Stick

In the realm of law, promises play an essential role, particularly regarding the protection of reliance. This post will be about the protection of reasonable reliance on statements made by a party to a contract or a potential contract. In a contract, the preservation of one party’s reliance may be equally as significant as the protection of both parties’ reasonable expectations.

Read More »
Mortgage Default

What to Expect When You Default on a Mortgage

When a default occurs, the mortgagee, or lender, has the right to accelerate the mortgage payment or seek specific performance or damages. They can also sell the property to repay their debt. If the sale proceeds are less than the mortgage debt, the mortgagee can sue the borrower for the deficiency. If the sale results in a surplus, the mortgagee must pass it on to the next encumbrancer or the borrower.

Read More »
Letters of Credit

The Self-Contained World of Letters of Credit

Letters of credit (LC) and bank guarantees are financial tools used to secure payment obligations. However, they differ from regular guarantees in terms of the defences against payment demands. An LC is simply an agreement to pay under certain conditions, and the law governing LCs is determined by the national jurisdiction where the LC is issued.

Read More »
Rule 21

Rule 21: The Road to a Speedy Resolution of Legal Proceedings

Rule 21 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure is a mechanism for dealing with situations where a claim brought by a plaintiff is clearly of a kind for which no legal relief is available or where the defence submitted by the defendant is not valid. The rule allows for the determination of certain preliminary issues that may dispose of a legal proceeding without the need for a trial to avoid delays and ensure that issues are disposed of promptly and in accordance with the Rules.

Read More »
Director Liability - Voting for and Consenting to Resolutions

The OBCA’s Director Liabilities: The Risks of Consenting to and Voting for Certain Resolutions

In Ontario, under the Ontario Business Corporations Act, directors of a corporation have a legal responsibility to ensure that the corporation is financially stable before making certain transactions. This includes the payment of dividends, redemption or reacquisition of shares, reduction of stated capital, or provision of financial assistance to certain non-arm’s length persons.

Read More »
Cryptocurrency and Insolvency

The Conundrum of Cryptocurrency: How Canadian Law Classifies Digital Assets in Insolvency

The question of how cryptocurrencies are classified under Canadian bankruptcy law has again been brought to the forefront with the collapse of Bahamas-based cryptocurrency exchange FTX . . . While there is broad acceptance that cryptocurrencies are likely assets, there is no widespread agreement on how to classify them – are they financial assets, intangible assets, inventory, investment property or something else?

Read More »
Rent Obligations During Receivership

Navigating Rent Obligations in Receivership Proceedings

When it comes to court-appointed receiverships, there can be much confusion surrounding the issue of rent obligations. Essentially, the main tension arises from the fact that existing legal principles don’t always align with what a receiver would like to do in practice.

Read More »
Ontario's Consumer Protection Act

Consumer 101: An Introductory Overview of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 in the Province of Ontario

The Consumer Protection Act, 2002 (“CPA”) is a piece of legislation in Ontario that was put in place to safeguard customers’ interests in their interactions with various commercial enterprises. If a consumer’s rights are infringed upon, it details the legal recourses available to them as well as the rights and responsibilities of both businesses and customers.

Read More »
Modern Proof in Mental Injury Cases

The Shift Towards Modern Proof in Mental Injury Cases

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saadati fundamentally altered the way in which tort law responds to mental injury by attempting to align it more closely with the way it sponds to physical injuries. In this particular case, the Court upheld a trial judge’s award for Mr. Saadati’s mental injury, despite the absence of a diagnosis of a recognized psychiatric illness.

Read More »