Domestic Contracts: Essential Knowledge for Ontario Couples

Denis Grigoras

Denis is a lawyer who draws on his background in complex legal disputes and transactions to problem-solve for his clients.

Ontario’s Family Law Act (“FLA”) contains provisions under Part IV that regulate domestic contracts, including cohabitation agreements, marriage contracts, and separation agreements. These agreements primarily focus on legally enforceable matters, such as property division, spousal support, and children’s education.

Domestic Contracts


Ontario’s Family Law Act (“FLA”) contains provisions under Part IV that regulate domestic contracts, including cohabitation agreements, marriage contracts, and separation agreements. These agreements primarily focus on legally enforceable matters, such as property division, spousal support, and children’s education.

Cohabitation Agreements

Under Section 53 of the FLA, two individuals, regardless of gender or marital status, can enter into a cohabitation agreement that outlines their rights and responsibilities during cohabitation, separation, or death. The cohabitation agreement can cover issues related to property, support, children’s education, and other relevant matters. If the couple decides to marry, the cohabitation agreement automatically transforms into a marriage contract, unless the agreement states otherwise. However, provisions that limit a spouse’s rights to the matrimonial home become unenforceable upon marriage (section 52(2)).

Marriage Contracts

Marriage contracts are agreements made by couples who are married or planning to marry, which outline their rights and responsibilities during the marriage, separation, or dissolution of the marriage. These contracts address similar issues as cohabitation agreements but cannot include child custody or access. Marriage contracts require a high level of fidelity and good faith, imposing a higher duty of good faith than separation agreements.

Separation Agreements

Individuals who previously cohabited but are now living separately can enter into separation agreements to resolve their affairs. These agreements may address property division, spousal support, children’s education, child custody, access, and other related matters (section 54).

Paternity Agreements

Although not classified as domestic contracts, paternity agreements can be entered into by non-spouses for the payment of prenatal care, birth, child support, or funeral expenses. The court has jurisdiction over paternity and child support issues. Paternity agreements can be incorporated into an order by either the Ontario Court of Justice or the Family Court of the Superior Court of Justice upon application (section 59(1)). Minors can enter paternity agreements with court approval (section 59(4)).

The Matrimonial Home

A marriage contract cannot limit a spouse’s rights regarding the matrimonial home (section 52(2)), specifically the right to equal possession (section 19(1)) and the right to consent before disposition or encumbrance (section 21(1)). As a result, a couple cannot agree in advance that one spouse will move out upon separation or unilaterally sell or encumber the home. However, a marriage contract can address ownership of the matrimonial home, including which spouse owns it and whether its value is part of their “net family property.”

Foreign Agreements

Foreign agreements and domestic contracts made outside of Ontario are valid and enforceable in Ontario if they comply with Ontario’s internal law (section 58). Sections 33(4) and 56 of the FLA apply to contracts made outside of Ontario. To exclude a pre-existing contract from equalization under the FLA, it must address a “matter” similar to the Act’s equalization provisions. An agreement regarding property ownership alone is insufficient. To prevail over the FLA’s equalization provisions, a contract must address the parties’ relative economic positions upon marriage dissolution through asset distribution, either by excluding property from a spouse’s net family property under section 4(2)6 or by addressing equalization-type rights in a domestic contract to invoke section 2(10).

In a case involving a marriage contract signed in the Netherlands, the court ruled that the contract did not address equalization provisions, and therefore the matrimonial home was included in the husband’s net family property calculation. In another case involving a marriage contract signed in Quebec, the spouses adopted the separation of property regime from the Civil Code of Quebec. The contract could not be construed to provide for property division as contemplated by the Family Law Reform Act, and thus could not defeat the wife’s claim for a share in the matrimonial home.

Role of Domestic Contracts

Under the FLA

Domestic contracts can override the FLA’s provisions, and courts should enforce such agreements. Courts may incorporate domestic contract provisions into an FLA order, but only with both parties’ consent and no substantial dispute. Domestic contracts can be filed with the Ontario Court of Justice or Family Court of the Superior Court of Justice, and their support provisions are treated like court orders. The Superior Court of Justice retains parens patriae jurisdiction, irrespective of any domestic contract.

Under the Divorce Act

Child Support: Courts must follow the Child Support Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), but they can award a different amount if a written agreement benefits the child or if the Guidelines would result in an inequitable amount. Courts must explicitly state deviations from the Guidelines. In Willick v. Willick, the Supreme Court of Canada established that courts can override child support terms in a separation agreement. Restrictions on overriding spousal support terms do not apply to child support. Parents have a mutual obligation to support their children based on need and ability to pay, and a parent cannot bargain away a child’s right to support.

Spousal Support: Courts must consider agreements related to spousal support when ordering such support. Separation agreements should be respected if they are freely negotiated, with independent legal counsel, and not unconscionable. The more an agreement promotes equitable distribution, the more likely it will influence an application’s outcome. The Supreme Court of Canada limited the Pelech principles in Moge v. Moge and rejected applying the principles to “non-consensual” situations and provincial statutes.

In Miglin v. Miglin, the Supreme Court of Canada established a two-stage analysis for spousal support applications inconsistent with a pre-existing agreement. First, the court examines the agreement’s negotiation and execution circumstances. Fairly negotiated agreements should express the parties’ substantive intent. Then, the court examines the agreement’s content and determines if it substantially meets Divorce Act objectives and factors. Only significant changes in circumstances from what could have been reasonably foreseen at negotiation should warrant judicial interference with a fairly negotiated settlement agreement. The Court acknowledged that professional assistance does not eliminate vulnerabilities, and contractual autonomy depends on financial disclosure and negotiation integrity. An agreement without full and honest financial disclosure cannot be a true bargain deserving judicial deference.

Religious Agreements

In Bruker v. Marcovitz, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that religious aspects in a dispute do not make it non-justiciable, and moral obligations can be legally binding. One such obligation in Islamic law is the mahr, a monetary or property gift from the husband to the wife. It signifies the marriage contract’s importance, prepares the husband for marital responsibilities, and provides protection for the wife if the marriage breaks down. Canadian courts have been divided on mahr enforcement.

In Kaddoura v. Hammoud, the Ontario Court declined to determine parties’ rights and obligations under the mahr to avoid entering the “religious thicket.” However, in Khamis v. Noormohamed, following Bruker v. Marcovitz, the Court used the Family Law Act to determine if the agreement was valid and binding. The agreement was found binding under the Family Law Act as it met all necessary criteria, and the Court refused to set it aside. Additionally, the mahr was considered excluded property under the Family Law Act as per the domestic contract.

Setting Aside Domestic Contracts

Law of Contracts: Domestic contracts must meet the same criteria as other contracts, such as consensus ad idem, an offer, acceptance, and consideration. Agreements may be binding if they contain essential terms, even if parties intend to record them in a more formal document later. The Court of Appeal explained that a “contract to make a contract” can be enforceable unless parties intend to defer legal obligations until a formal contract is executed. Memorandums of Agreement may be binding contracts if they contain all essential terms, even if a more formal document is anticipated. Contracts with drafting errors may be void ab initio if there is no consensus ad idem.

In cases where a declaration to set aside a contract is sought, no limitation period applies if no consequential relief is sought. However, claims for equalization are subject to a six-year limitation period.

Formal Requirements: Section 55 of the FLA states that a domestic contract must be in writing, signed by both parties, and witnessed to be enforceable. However, a court may enforce an authorized settlement agreement negotiated by counsel in pending litigation, even if it does not comply with section 55. The Court held that the strict requirements of section 55(1) may be relaxed if the contract was executed by the parties, the terms are reasonable, and no oppression or unfairness occurred during negotiation and execution.

Section 33(4) and 56(4) of the FLA: Section 33(4) allows courts to set aside support provisions or support waivers in domestic contracts and make orders despite those provisions. Courts can exercise this authority if the resulting circumstances are unconscionable, the dependent qualifies for public money support, or the support obligation is in default. Parents cannot waive a child’s right to support. Section 56(4) gives courts the authority to set aside all or part of a domestic contract if a party fails to disclose significant assets, debts, or liabilities, does not understand the agreement’s nature or consequences, or if the contract doesn’t align with common law principles.

Lack of Financial Disclosure—Section 56(4)(a): If substantial assets or liabilities are not disclosed, a court may set aside a domestic agreement under section 56(4)(a). Disclosure must include quantification or valuation of assets and liabilities. The Family Law Act does not prevent a litigant from entering a binding settlement with financial disclosure, but the party seeking to set aside the agreement must prove that the disclosure was inaccurate, misleading, or false.

Failure to Understand Agreement—Section 56(4)(b): Even with independent legal advice and full disclosure, a party may argue they didn’t understand the agreement’s legal consequences under section 56(4)(b). Independent legal advice should involve more than just reviewing a domestic contract and asking the client if they agree.

Common Law Grounds—Section 56(4)(c): Section 56(4)(c) of the FLA allows courts to apply common law grounds for setting aside contracts in the family law context. In family law, unconscionability requires weakness in bargaining position and unfair advantage by the other party. Duress is defined as compulsion through fear or personal suffering, and a contract obtained through duress is voidable. Undue influence is concerned with the influence on the weaker party’s state of mind, while unconscionability emphasizes the objective unfairness of an agreement. Material misrepresentation can lead to setting aside an agreement. In Rick v. Brandsema, the Supreme Court of Canada reinstated the trial judge’s decision that an agreement was unconscionable, emphasizing that contractual autonomy relies on the negotiating process’s integrity and full financial disclosure.

In conclusion, domestic contracts play a vital role in Ontario family law. They provide a framework for couples to define their rights and obligations during cohabitation, marriage, and separation. It is essential for couples entering into such agreements to understand the legal implications, provide full financial disclosure, and seek independent legal advice to ensure the contract’s enforceability.

In Ontario, domestic contracts can override provisions in the FLA, and courts are generally inclined to enforce such agreements. However, under certain circumstances, courts may set aside domestic contracts if they do not align with common law principles or if there is a lack of financial disclosure or understanding of the agreement.

Foreign agreements and domestic contracts made outside of Ontario can be valid and enforceable in the province if they comply with Ontario’s internal law. Parties should be aware that pre-existing contracts from other jurisdictions may be subject to scrutiny under the FLA, and it is crucial to address matters similar to the Act’s equalization provisions to exclude them from equalization.

Domestic contracts may also include religious agreements, such as the mahr in Islamic law. Canadian courts have been divided on the enforcement of such agreements, but following the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Bruker v. Marcovitz, some courts have enforced religious agreements under the FLA when they meet the necessary criteria.

Setting aside domestic contracts follows the same principles as other contracts, with the additional consideration of sections 33(4) and 56(4) of the FLA. Courts may set aside a domestic contract if it fails to meet formal requirements, if a party fails to disclose significant assets or liabilities, or if the agreement does not align with common law principles. It is crucial for couples to ensure their domestic contracts are properly drafted and meet all legal requirements to avoid future disputes.

In summary, domestic contracts are an essential aspect of family law in Ontario, providing a foundation for couples to manage their affairs during cohabitation, marriage, and separation. By understanding the legal implications, providing full financial disclosure, and seeking independent legal advice, couples can create enforceable agreements that protect their rights and interests. As family law continues to evolve, it is vital for legal professionals and couples to stay informed about the latest developments in domestic contracts and their enforcement.

Are you considering a cohabitation, marriage, or separation agreement in Ontario? Ensure your rights and interests are protected.

Talk to a Family Lawyer

Stay Connected

More Posts

Choosing the Right Commercial Litigation Toronto

Discover the key factors to consider when choosing Commercial Litigation Toronto services. Grigoras Law offers expertise in diverse legal challenges, prioritizing client needs and business impacts. With proactive strategies, skilled negotiation, and cutting-edge technology, they ensure favorable outcomes while safeguarding client interests. Trust their client-centric approach for effective resolution.

Read More »

How Business Sale Lawyers Facilitate Smooth Transitions

Discover the critical role of business sale lawyers in navigating the intricate legal landscape of selling a business. Grigoras Law excels in providing expert guidance, conducting thorough due diligence, negotiating contracts, and mitigating risks. With a client-centric approach and comprehensive legal services, we champion your business interests for a seamless transition.

Read More »

How Appeal Lawyer Toronto Can Help You Win

Facing a challenging verdict in Toronto? Grigoras Law offers unmatched expertise in appellate litigation. Our expert Appeal Lawyers meticulously dissect trial records, crafting compelling arguments to navigate the complexities of higher courts. With comprehensive support and a strategic approach, we ensure every client receives the best chance for success.

Read More »

3 Benefits of Hiring a Business Sale Lawyer

Streamline your business sale with Grigoras Law. Our specialized Sale Lawyers provide expert guidance, navigating complex transactions with precision. We mitigate legal risks, ensuring your interests are protected at every turn. From negotiation to dispute resolution, trust us to achieve the best outcome for your business sale journey.

Read More »

Your Path to Legal Victory: Expert Lawsuit Lawyers Toronto, ON

Grigoras Law, a beacon in Toronto’s legal landscape, offers unmatched expertise in lawsuits. Their client-centric approach prioritizes individual needs, ensuring tailored legal strategies and comprehensive support. With a commitment to excellence and unwavering dedication, they deliver exceptional results, building enduring relationships based on trust and respect. Choose Grigoras Law for unparalleled legal counsel.

Read More »

Why Toronto Shareholder Agreement Lawyers Matter

Grigoras Law emphasizes the vital role Toronto Shareholder Agreement Lawyers play in safeguarding business interests. Their tailored solutions ensure clarity, fairness, and legal compliance, navigating complex landscapes and providing expert representation in disputes. With a client-centric approach, they become partners in business success, offering robust frameworks for thriving in competitive markets.

Read More »
Business Sale Lawyer

How Does a Business Sale Lawyer Guide You to Success?

Grigoras Law offers specialized Business Sale Lawyers to streamline the sale of your business, ensuring legal compliance and maximizing profitability. Our approach focuses on early engagement, due diligence, skilled negotiation, and addressing legal intricacies to protect your interests. With a client-centric philosophy and a comprehensive legal expertise, we provide tailored, cost-effective legal solutions designed for your success. Our commitment is to deliver value and support through every step of your business transaction.

Read More »

How a Business Lawyer Toronto Can Help Your Company Thrive

Grigoras Law highlights the importance of a Business Lawyer in Toronto for company growth, emphasizing legal compliance, contract management, business formation, intellectual property protection, and dispute resolution. They offer personalized, cost-effective legal services for small businesses, ensuring comprehensive support for navigating legal complexities and achieving business success.

Read More »

The Role of a Small Business Lawyer Toronto

Grigoras Law champions small businesses with tailored legal services, emphasizing compliance, contract management, business formation, IP protection, and dispute resolution, offering cost-effective solutions and comprehensive support for business growth and success.

Read More »

The Best Appeal Lawyer near me: Your Search ends here!

Grigoras Law offers expert appeal lawyer services, emphasizing a client-centric approach, transparent communication, and comprehensive legal expertise. Specializing in appellate processes and offering multifaceted legal solutions, they ensure personalized and effective representation for challenging court decisions.

Read More »

When is The Best Time To Hire Civil Lawyer Near Me?

Deciding to hire a civil lawyer is crucial when facing legal challenges. Grigoras Law emphasizes the importance of experience, communication, reputation, availability, and strategic planning in choosing a lawyer. They offer expert legal assistance for lawsuits, negotiations, and protecting rights.

Read More »
How to Choose the Right Toronto Civil Lawyer

How to Choose the Right Toronto Civil Lawyer?

Grigoras Law offers guidance in navigating Canadian civil litigation’s complexities, emphasizing the importance of selecting specialized Toronto civil lawyers for successful legal outcomes. It outlines steps for understanding your case, evaluating lawyer expertise and compatibility, and provides tips for choosing the right legal representation, stressing experience, budget, and personal fit.

Read More »

Is Civil Litigation Toronto Right for You?

Civil litigation in Toronto encompasses legal disputes outside criminal charges, including personal injury, property, and intellectual property conflicts, offering pathways to justice through compensation or settlements, guided by experienced litigators.

Read More »

Who Can Benefit from Defamation Lawyer Toronto?

Defamation involves spreading false statements that harm reputations, affecting individuals and businesses. Toronto defamation lawyers offer legal guidance, strategic representation, and reputation management to combat these damaging claims and protect clients’ reputations.

Read More »

Insider Tips to Identify the Right Defamation Lawyer Near Me

An outline covering the importance of hiring a skilled defamation lawyer, focusing on traits like expertise, success records, communication, strategic thinking, and client-centered approaches. Grigoras Law offers guidance in selecting top defamation lawyers in Toronto for effective case resolution.

Read More »

Difference Between Civil & Commercial Litigation GTA

Understanding the differences between civil and commercial litigation in Toronto is crucial for navigating legal disputes effectively. This text highlights the distinctions, procedures, and importance of choosing specialized lawyers for individuals and businesses, emphasizing Grigoras Law’s expertise in achieving favorable outcomes.

Read More »
Google Reviews | Toronto Defamation Lawyers

Can You Sue Google for a Defamatory Google Review?

For now, Thorpe v. Boakye serves as a pivotal case in understanding the evolving legal landscape around digital platform liability. It highlights a significant divergence between Canadian and U.S. legal systems in handling online defamation. Canadian courts appear more open to considering platforms like Google as publishers and thus potentially liable, whereas U.S. law, under the CDA, leans heavily towards protecting these platforms from such liabilities.

Read More »
Ontario Shareholder Remedies | Toronto Commercial Litigation Lawyers

Ontario Shareholder Remedies Explained

In the intricate world of corporate law, shareholders possess a slew of rights. When these rights are jeopardized, or when the corporation’s actions seem unjust or prejudicial, shareholders can turn to specific remedies enshrined in the law.

Read More »
What Business Structure Should I Use in Ontario | Toronto Business Lawyers

What Business Structure Should I Use in Ontario?

Starting a business is a thrilling adventure, akin to setting out on an uncharted path. Every decision made at the outset lays the foundation for future success. One such pivotal decision is selecting the right business structure. This isn’t just a bureaucratic step; it shapes the very essence of your business, influencing liability, tax implications, operational processes, and more.

Read More »
Sublease vs Assignment

Assignment vs. Sublease in Commercial Tenancies

Navigating the complex landscape of commercial tenancies becomes even more intricate when terms like “assignment” and “sublease” emerge. While these terms may sometimes be used interchangeably by those less acquainted with property jargon, they embody distinct concepts with specific legal implications. Grasping the differences between them is vital for both tenants and landlords to facilitate seamless transitions and evade potential pitfalls.

Read More »
Online Trolls

Defamation in the Age of Online Trolls

The freedom of the internet allows for uninhibited self-expression. While many embrace this freedom to share positive stories, ideas, and feedback, others exploit it to spread malicious rumors or make derogatory comments without facing immediate consequences. The cloak of anonymity can embolden such individuals, making the internet a potential hotbed for defamation.

Read More »
Stolen Funds

Sase Aggregate: Court of Appeal’s Take on Stolen Funds

In the constantly evolving realm of legal jurisprudence, the case of Sase Aggregate Ltd. v. Langdon offers intriguing insights into the principles of knowing receipt, knowing assistance, and unjust enrichment. This article dives into why Sase Aggregate Ltd., the appellant, was unsuccessful in both its initial application to the lower court and its subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

Read More »
Selling Your Business

Selling Your Business: The Importance of Proper Valuation

For many business owners, the question “How much is my business actually worth?” weighs heavy on their minds. This is particularly true if you’re considering selling your business. The value of your business significantly influences the returns you receive from its sale. This factor not only affects your negotiation strategies but also has potential implications for your future financial well-being. The process of determining this value is known as business valuation, and it’s an intricate, multilayered exercise that requires expert knowledge.

Read More »

Defamation Law Explained: How the Parties’ Conduct Impacts Ontario Cases

When the invisible line of respect between individuals in society is crossed through defamatory comments, the law provides a remedy through defamation lawsuits. However, these cases are not black-and-white. Their outcomes can be influenced by the actions and behaviour of involved parties – both before and after the publication of the defamation. In Ontario, this scrutiny of conduct plays a pivotal role in shaping legal outcomes.

Read More »
Defamation Damages

How Defamation Damages Work in Ontario: A Detailed Look

Understanding defamation law, especially when considering the potential damages, is no small feat. The nuances and complexities can be overwhelming, yet having a clear comprehension of what the damages entail is invaluable for plaintiffs and defendants alike. In Ontario, defamation law encompasses three key types of damages: Aggravated, Special, and Punitive Damages.

Read More »
Parliamentary Privilege

Between Privilege and Liability: Ontario’s Lawmakers in the Balance

When we talk about “parliamentary privilege,” we refer to a set of rights and protections that enable lawmakers at the federal and provincial levels in Canada to perform their duties without fear of being legally liable. These privileges safeguard the democratic principles Canada is built upon, ensuring each branch of government respects the others’ roles.

Read More »
False Light Tort

Shedding Light on the False Light Tort

In 2019, Ontario recognized “publicity which places an individual in a false light” – the “false light tort” – as a part of the common law. Despite its relatively straightforward definition, the false light tort remains puzzling due to its ambiguous parameters, unique elements, and potential utility.

Read More »
Canadian Tax on Professional Athletes

Extra Points: The Game of Canadian Taxation for Athletes

How does Canadian tax law impact professional athletes? To understand this, we need to think about multiple scenarios, and consider the athlete’s residency, their affiliations with Canadian or foreign-based teams, and the ever-changing political landscape surrounding the taxation of sports franchises in Canada.

Read More »
Airline Liability

When Bags Fly: Airline Baggage and Cargo Liability

When your cargo or luggage gets damaged or lost during international air transport, you might think that the airline will compensate you for your losses. However, the legal landscape surrounding airline liability for international cargo and baggage is complex. It’s governed by international conventions like the Warsaw Convention and the Montreal Convention, which establish specific rules and liability limits for airlines.

Read More »
The Business Judgment Rule

The Business Judgment Rule: A Director’s Guide to Risky Business

The business judgment rule has its roots firmly planted in the need to facilitate an environment of innovation and growth in business. Recognizing that running a business often involves taking risks, this rule has been developed to shield directors and officers who are willing to take calculated chances to propel a corporation forward.

Read More »
Civil Fraud

Civil Fraud: The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Civil fraud, also known as deceit, is a serious economic tort or civil wrong that involves a deliberate deception through false representation. It requires four elements: a false representation by the defendant, their knowledge (or recklessness) of the falsehood, the plaintiff’s action influenced by this representation, and a loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result.

Read More »
Nevada's Court System

Silver State Justice: A Closer Look at Nevada’s Court System

The judicial system in Nevada plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring the fair administration of justice. The courts covered include Municipal Courts, Justice Courts, Small Claims Court, District Courts, Family Courts, and Appellate Courts, comprising the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Read More »
Insider Trading

Insider Intel: Navigating the Gray Areas of Insider Trading

An “insider” is broadly defined, including the corporation, directors, officers, major shareholders, employees, and professionals like lawyers or accountants. Liability extends to those receiving confidential information from insiders (tippees). Insiders cannot tip others for trading advantages. If an insider tips an unrelated person, they are liable for damages and accountable to the corporation for benefits received.

Read More »

Will ChatGPT Replace Lawyers?

In recent months, the rise of advanced artificial intelligence and natural language processing technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, has sparked a debate about their potential impact on various industries, including the legal profession. The million-dollar question inevitably arises: Will LLMs replace lawyers (and perhaps judges also), or at the very least, lead to a massive paradigm shift in law practice?

Read More »
Apologies and Retractions in Defamation Law

Sorry, Not Sorry: Apologies & Retractions in Defamation Law

In defamation cases, an apology may play a crucial role in the assessment of damages. However, it is important to note that courts lack the jurisdiction to order defendants to apologize. The existence of an apology, the sincerity of the defendant, and the extent of the publicity given to the apology are factors that courts consider when determining damages.

Read More »
Tracing Commingled Funds - The Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule

Tracing Commingled Funds: Unraveling the LIBR Mystery

The Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule (“LIBR“) is an essential concept in the legal world, particularly in cases involving the tracing of funds. It is an evidential rule that assumes that when a person commingles their own funds with funds belonging to someone else, they are assumed to have spent their own funds first.

Read More »
Equitable Fraud

Unconscientious, Unconscionable, Unfair: Equitable Fraud

Traditionally, fraud has been understood as involving deceit or intentional misrepresentation. However, the courts have expanded the concept to encompass equitable or constructive fraud, which includes various forms of unfair dealing and unconscionable conduct in contractual matters.

Read More »
Abuse of Power

Suing a City: Abuse of Power Lawsuits

Yes, believe it or not, you can sue a city. Municipal corporations, which include cities, are no longer immune to liability as they were in the past. They can be held accountable for various wrongdoings, such as tortious acts, breaches of contract, and neglecting statutory duties.

Read More »
Property Damage Claims

Rylands v. Fletcher: Property Damage Claims

Rylands v. Fletcher is a landmark case in English tort law that established the principle of strict liability for certain harmful activities. The rule states that a person who uses their land for non-natural purposes and accumulates a potentially dangerous substance on their property may be held strictly liable if that substance escapes and causes damage to another’s property.

Read More »
Notice Requirements

The Fine Print: Notice Requirements in Ontario Defamation Law

In Ontario, special notice requirements apply to defamation cases involving libel in a newspaper printed and published in the province or a broadcast from a station within Ontario. Plaintiffs must provide written notice to the defendant within six weeks after becoming aware of the alleged libel.

Read More »
Tort of Conversion

The Battle for Chattel: Understanding the Tort of Conversion

The tort of conversion primarily deals with the unlawful interference of another person’s movable personal property, known as chattels. In contrast to trespass to goods, conversion demands more than just a simple invasion of the plaintiff’s possessory rights; it necessitates an interference that denies the plaintiff’s title.

Read More »
The Principal Residence Exemption

The Principal Residence Exemption

The term “principal residence” refers to a taxpayer’s primary dwelling or housing unit for a specific tax year. The taxpayer, their spouse, common-law partner, former spouse, or child must ordinarily inhabit the residence. A personal trust can also claim a principal residence if it is regularly occupied by a specified beneficiary or their immediate family.

Read More »

From Threats to Torts: The Law on Intimidation

The tort of intimidation, a relatively less explored area of common law, has been recognized and established through a series of judicial decisions. The House of Lords in Rookes v. Barnard (“Rookes“) formally acknowledged the existence of this tort, which has since been accepted as part of the common law in Canada.

Read More »
Cosmetics Business

Starting a Cosmetics Business: For Entrepreneurs

The Canadian cosmetics industry generates billions of dollars. In 2021, the cosmetics market in Canada generated approximately USD 1.24 billion in revenue, and industry revenue is expected to grow by 1.45% annually to reach USD 1.8 billion by 2024.

Read More »
Spousal Support

Understanding Spousal Support: Key Elements

In family law, spousal support is central to helping spouses who have become financially disadvantaged due to the breakdown of a marriage or common-law relationship. This post examines the legal principles and case law surrounding spousal support, discussing child support priority, general principles, and various factors that influence support amounts and duration.

Read More »
Shareholder Loans

The Tax Maze: How Shareholder Loans Impact Your Taxes

According to Section 15(2) of the Income Tax Act, a shareholder (or a person or partnership connected to the shareholder) may be deemed to have received a taxable benefit equal to the amount of a loan or debt made by a corporation. This taxable benefit is included in the shareholder’s income for the tax year in which the loan or debt arose.

Read More »
Internet Communication

Is Internet Communication a Broadcast in Defamation?

Over time, Canadian provincial legislation regulating defamation has been updated to incorporate modern communication methods. However, since most of this legislation does not explicitly address the Internet, judges are often required to draw parallels between Internet communications and traditional media forms, such as newspapers and broadcasts, that are covered by the legislation.

Read More »
Incorporating in Ontario

The Entrepreneur’s Roadmap to Incorporating in Ontario

Incorporating a company in Ontario has become more streamlined and accessible thanks to the introduction of the Ontario Business Registry on October 19, 2021. This guide will provide a detailed overview of the incorporation process, from preparing and submitting the required documentation to understanding the fees and legal obligations involved.

Read More »
I was sued

I Was Sued, Now What? (A Step-by-Step Guide)

Litigation is a complex process that requires careful attention to detail and a thorough understanding of the rules and procedures that govern the legal system. In this blog post, we explore the various stages of a lawsuit in Ontario, from the initial pleadings to the final trial.

Read More »
Class Action Certification

All for One, and One for All: Class Action Certification in Canada

In the Canadian legal landscape, class actions represent a powerful mechanism for individuals who have suffered similar harm or losses to collectively seek legal redress against a common defendant. These lawsuits serve multiple purposes, such as providing access to justice for people who might not have the means to pursue individual litigation, encouraging behavioural modification in large corporations or organizations, and promoting judicial efficiency by consolidating numerous related cases into a single legal action.

Read More »
Shareholders' Agreement

Drafting an Effective Shareholders’ Agreement

An essential contract for small non-offering corporations, shareholders’ agreements define the rights, privileges, liabilities, and responsibilities of each shareholder. These agreements, also known as “unanimous shareholders’ agreements,” offer a framework to govern various aspects of a corporation’s functioning, such as delineating shareholder roles, placing limitations on certain actions, and regulating share transfers.

Read More »