Understanding Spousal Support: Key Elements

Denis Grigoras

Denis is a lawyer who draws on his background in complex legal disputes and transactions to problem-solve for his clients.

In family law, spousal support is central to helping spouses who have become financially disadvantaged due to the breakdown of a marriage or common-law relationship. This post examines the legal principles and case law surrounding spousal support, discussing child support priority, general principles, and various factors that influence support amounts and duration.

Spousal Support


In family law, spousal support is central to helping spouses who have become financially disadvantaged due to the breakdown of a marriage or common-law relationship. This post examines the legal principles and case law surrounding spousal support, discussing child support priority, general principles, and various factors that influence support amounts and duration. Understanding these principles can help you navigate the complexities of spousal support in family law.

Priority to Child Support

According to Section 38.1(1) of the Family Law Act (“FLA”), child support takes precedence over spousal or same-sex partner support. Courts must document the reasons if prioritizing child support reduces or eliminates spousal support. Significant changes in child support may necessitate revisiting spousal support decisions, and the standard two-year limitation for spousal support applications is not applicable in these situations.

General Principles

The FLA’s spousal support principles resemble those of the Divorce Act, considering factors such as needs, income, assets, self-sufficiency, relationship duration, lump-sum payment, and written agreements. Courts are instructed by paragraph 33(8) of the FLA to acknowledge contributions, share child support burdens, aid in self-support, and alleviate financial hardship when determining support orders. These principles apply to both the Divorce Act and provincial legislation, as confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Bracklow v. Bracklow.

Moge v. Moge

The Supreme Court of Canada established a compensatory model for spousal support in the 1992 case of Moge v. Moge, extending criteria beyond need and capacity to pay. Under the Divorce Act, courts must consider four objectives: (a) acknowledging economic advantages/disadvantages stemming from the marriage/breakdown, (b) allocating financial consequences from childcare, (c) alleviating economic hardship, and (d) promoting economic self-sufficiency when feasible. No single objective is paramount, and being married does not guarantee support. The goal is to address the disadvantaged spouse’s economic losses as fully as possible, considering the payor’s ability. Equitable distribution can be achieved through spousal/child support and property division. Moge transformed spousal support law, generally resulting in higher amounts and longer durations.

Bracklow v. Bracklow

In the 1999 case of Bracklow v. Bracklow, the Supreme Court of Canada identified three statutory bases for spousal support: contractual, compensatory, and non-compensatory. Factors such as agreements, financial circumstances, and self-sufficiency must be considered. In this case, Mrs. Bracklow received support due to the length of cohabitation, hardship, need, and her husband’s ability to pay. Compensatory support addresses economic disadvantages arising from marriage or its breakdown, while non-compensatory support recognizes interdependence and the potential need for support after marriage.

Quantum/Amount and Duration

Spousal support orders can be time-limited or indefinite, depending on factors like the length of the marriage, the presence of children, and each party’s ability to work. Support payments may be periodic or a lump sum. Courts consider various circumstances outlined in section 33(9) of the FLA, including assets, means, capacity to support, age, health, standard of living, career contributions, childcare responsibilities, cohabitation length, and other legal rights to support. Section 33(9)(m) clarifies that this list is not exhaustive.

In Climans v. Latner, a case involving a 14-year relationship with an opulent lifestyle and separate residences, the lower court determined the parties were “spouses” under section 29 of the FLA and granted spousal support. However, the Court of Appeal determined that the trial judge incorrectly applied the “rule of 65” for indefinite support, as the requirement of cohabiting in the first five months of the relationship was not met. The Court of Appeal reversed the indefinite support order and capped it at 10 years, following the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines range of seven to 14 years.

Lump Sum Payments

In some cases, parties may agree or the court may order spousal support to be paid as a lump sum, rather than periodic payments. A lump sum payment represents the present value of the total spousal support obligation, paid in one installment. This approach can provide both parties with financial certainty and may help the recipient achieve financial independence more quickly.

There are several factors to consider when determining whether a lump sum payment is appropriate, including the financial circumstances of both parties, the tax implications of the payment, and the feasibility of making such a payment. It is essential to carefully assess these factors and consult with a knowledgeable family law professional to determine if a lump sum payment is appropriate in a particular case.

Impact of a Party’s New Relationship

The existence of a new relationship for either the payor or the recipient of spousal support can have an impact on the determination of spousal support. Generally, a new relationship may affect the recipient’s need for support or the payor’s ability to pay.

If the recipient enters a new relationship and begins cohabiting with a new partner, the court may consider the new partner’s financial contributions and reassess the recipient’s need for spousal support. This could result in a reduction or termination of spousal support payments, depending on the circumstances. However, each case is unique, and the court will consider various factors, such as the duration and financial arrangements of the new relationship, before making any adjustments to the spousal support order.

On the other hand, if the payor enters a new relationship, the court may consider the new partner’s financial resources in assessing the payor’s ability to pay spousal support. However, it is important to note that the payor’s primary obligation is to their former spouse, and the court will not allow the payor to avoid their spousal support obligations by voluntarily choosing to support a new partner.

Variation of Support Orders

Spousal support orders can be varied if there is a material change in circumstances. This may include changes in the financial situation of either party, the emergence of health issues, or a change in childcare responsibilities. The court has the authority to modify, suspend, or terminate spousal support orders as it deems appropriate in response to these changes.

Termination of Support

Spousal support can be terminated upon the death of either party, the remarriage of the recipient, or in cases where the court deems that the recipient is now self-sufficient. A court may also set a specific end date for spousal support payments in the original order, depending on the circumstances of the case.

Impact of Taxes

Spousal support payments are considered taxable income for the recipient and tax-deductible for the payor. This tax treatment may have implications on the net amount of spousal support received or paid. Parties should consider the tax implications when negotiating spousal support agreements, and the court may take these factors into account when determining the appropriate amount of support.

Enforcement of Support Orders

Spousal support orders can be enforced through the Family Responsibility Office (“FRO”) in Ontario. The FRO has the authority to take various measures to ensure compliance with support orders, such as garnishing wages, suspending driver’s licenses, or initiating legal proceedings against the non-compliant party.

Understanding the Time Limits for Seeking Spousal Support

In the case of Kyle v. Atwill, the Court of Appeal discussed the interplay between the Limitations Act and the Family Law Act in determining limitation periods for spousal support (and equalization claims). The Court of Appeal acknowledged that, in most cases, the limitation periods provided in the family law context are more generous than the two-year period set out in s. 4 of the Limitations Act, due to the unique circumstances surrounding the dissolution of a marriage.

Section 19(1)(a) of the Limitations Act allows for the application of limitation periods contained in other acts, such as the Family Law Act. For equalization of net family property, s. 7(3) of the Family Law Act outlines three limitation periods for applications. Unlike the Limitations Act, the court may extend limitation periods provided in the Family Law Act under s. 2(8) of that Act in certain circumstances.

Regarding spousal support, the Family Law Act does not provide a limitation period for seeking an order under s. 33(1). Instead, s. 16(1)(c) of the Limitations Act establishes that there is no limitation period for bringing a proceeding to obtain support or enforce a support contract under the Family Law Act. This accounts for the need to allow spouses more time to resolve property issues and address changing support needs.

The Court of Appeal also examined limitation periods for setting aside domestic contracts, such as marriage contracts under s. 52 of the Family Law Act. The Family Law Act includes provisions that allow a court to set aside all or part of a marriage contract in certain situations, as outlined in s. 33(4) and s. 56(4). However, no limitation period is provided in the Family Law Act for setting aside a domestic contract under s. 56(4) or a spousal support provision of a marriage contract under s. 33(4).

Since the Family Law Act is silent on the limitation period for an application to set aside a marriage contract under s. 56(4), the court must look to the Limitations Act to determine the applicable provisions. The Court of Appeal in Kyle v. Atwill rejected the view that the limitation period for equalization should also apply to an application to set aside a marriage contract under s. 56(4) of the Family Law Act. Instead, the absence of a limitation period in the Family Law Act for this action indicates that the Limitations Act should apply.


Spousal support is a complex area of family law, with many factors influencing the determination of entitlement, amount, and duration. Understanding the legal principles, relevant statutes, and case law can provide valuable insight into the potential outcomes of a spousal support case. If you are facing a spousal support issue, it is essential to consult with a knowledgeable family law lawyer to navigate this challenging legal landscape.

Spousal support aims to address the economic consequences of a relationship breakdown, taking into account various factors such as the needs and means of each party, the duration of the relationship, and the contributions made by each spouse. As illustrated by the cases discussed in this blog post, the courts will assess these factors on a case-by-case basis, considering the unique circumstances of each couple. It is crucial for anyone involved in a spousal support dispute to seek legal advice from an experienced family law lawyer to ensure a fair and equitable outcome.

Are you navigating the complexities of spousal support, or unsure about how recent case law and legal principles may impact your situation?

Talk to a Family Lawyer

Stay Connected

More Posts

Choosing the Right Commercial Litigation Toronto

Discover the key factors to consider when choosing Commercial Litigation Toronto services. Grigoras Law offers expertise in diverse legal challenges, prioritizing client needs and business impacts. With proactive strategies, skilled negotiation, and cutting-edge technology, they ensure favorable outcomes while safeguarding client interests. Trust their client-centric approach for effective resolution.

Read More »

How Business Sale Lawyers Facilitate Smooth Transitions

Discover the critical role of business sale lawyers in navigating the intricate legal landscape of selling a business. Grigoras Law excels in providing expert guidance, conducting thorough due diligence, negotiating contracts, and mitigating risks. With a client-centric approach and comprehensive legal services, we champion your business interests for a seamless transition.

Read More »

How Appeal Lawyer Toronto Can Help You Win

Facing a challenging verdict in Toronto? Grigoras Law offers unmatched expertise in appellate litigation. Our expert Appeal Lawyers meticulously dissect trial records, crafting compelling arguments to navigate the complexities of higher courts. With comprehensive support and a strategic approach, we ensure every client receives the best chance for success.

Read More »

3 Benefits of Hiring a Business Sale Lawyer

Streamline your business sale with Grigoras Law. Our specialized Sale Lawyers provide expert guidance, navigating complex transactions with precision. We mitigate legal risks, ensuring your interests are protected at every turn. From negotiation to dispute resolution, trust us to achieve the best outcome for your business sale journey.

Read More »

Your Path to Legal Victory: Expert Lawsuit Lawyers Toronto, ON

Grigoras Law, a beacon in Toronto’s legal landscape, offers unmatched expertise in lawsuits. Their client-centric approach prioritizes individual needs, ensuring tailored legal strategies and comprehensive support. With a commitment to excellence and unwavering dedication, they deliver exceptional results, building enduring relationships based on trust and respect. Choose Grigoras Law for unparalleled legal counsel.

Read More »

Why Toronto Shareholder Agreement Lawyers Matter

Grigoras Law emphasizes the vital role Toronto Shareholder Agreement Lawyers play in safeguarding business interests. Their tailored solutions ensure clarity, fairness, and legal compliance, navigating complex landscapes and providing expert representation in disputes. With a client-centric approach, they become partners in business success, offering robust frameworks for thriving in competitive markets.

Read More »
Business Sale Lawyer

How Does a Business Sale Lawyer Guide You to Success?

Grigoras Law offers specialized Business Sale Lawyers to streamline the sale of your business, ensuring legal compliance and maximizing profitability. Our approach focuses on early engagement, due diligence, skilled negotiation, and addressing legal intricacies to protect your interests. With a client-centric philosophy and a comprehensive legal expertise, we provide tailored, cost-effective legal solutions designed for your success. Our commitment is to deliver value and support through every step of your business transaction.

Read More »

How a Business Lawyer Toronto Can Help Your Company Thrive

Grigoras Law highlights the importance of a Business Lawyer in Toronto for company growth, emphasizing legal compliance, contract management, business formation, intellectual property protection, and dispute resolution. They offer personalized, cost-effective legal services for small businesses, ensuring comprehensive support for navigating legal complexities and achieving business success.

Read More »

The Role of a Small Business Lawyer Toronto

Grigoras Law champions small businesses with tailored legal services, emphasizing compliance, contract management, business formation, IP protection, and dispute resolution, offering cost-effective solutions and comprehensive support for business growth and success.

Read More »

The Best Appeal Lawyer near me: Your Search ends here!

Grigoras Law offers expert appeal lawyer services, emphasizing a client-centric approach, transparent communication, and comprehensive legal expertise. Specializing in appellate processes and offering multifaceted legal solutions, they ensure personalized and effective representation for challenging court decisions.

Read More »

When is The Best Time To Hire Civil Lawyer Near Me?

Deciding to hire a civil lawyer is crucial when facing legal challenges. Grigoras Law emphasizes the importance of experience, communication, reputation, availability, and strategic planning in choosing a lawyer. They offer expert legal assistance for lawsuits, negotiations, and protecting rights.

Read More »
How to Choose the Right Toronto Civil Lawyer

How to Choose the Right Toronto Civil Lawyer?

Grigoras Law offers guidance in navigating Canadian civil litigation’s complexities, emphasizing the importance of selecting specialized Toronto civil lawyers for successful legal outcomes. It outlines steps for understanding your case, evaluating lawyer expertise and compatibility, and provides tips for choosing the right legal representation, stressing experience, budget, and personal fit.

Read More »

Is Civil Litigation Toronto Right for You?

Civil litigation in Toronto encompasses legal disputes outside criminal charges, including personal injury, property, and intellectual property conflicts, offering pathways to justice through compensation or settlements, guided by experienced litigators.

Read More »

Who Can Benefit from Defamation Lawyer Toronto?

Defamation involves spreading false statements that harm reputations, affecting individuals and businesses. Toronto defamation lawyers offer legal guidance, strategic representation, and reputation management to combat these damaging claims and protect clients’ reputations.

Read More »

Insider Tips to Identify the Right Defamation Lawyer Near Me

An outline covering the importance of hiring a skilled defamation lawyer, focusing on traits like expertise, success records, communication, strategic thinking, and client-centered approaches. Grigoras Law offers guidance in selecting top defamation lawyers in Toronto for effective case resolution.

Read More »

Difference Between Civil & Commercial Litigation GTA

Understanding the differences between civil and commercial litigation in Toronto is crucial for navigating legal disputes effectively. This text highlights the distinctions, procedures, and importance of choosing specialized lawyers for individuals and businesses, emphasizing Grigoras Law’s expertise in achieving favorable outcomes.

Read More »
Google Reviews | Toronto Defamation Lawyers

Can You Sue Google for a Defamatory Google Review?

For now, Thorpe v. Boakye serves as a pivotal case in understanding the evolving legal landscape around digital platform liability. It highlights a significant divergence between Canadian and U.S. legal systems in handling online defamation. Canadian courts appear more open to considering platforms like Google as publishers and thus potentially liable, whereas U.S. law, under the CDA, leans heavily towards protecting these platforms from such liabilities.

Read More »
Ontario Shareholder Remedies | Toronto Commercial Litigation Lawyers

Ontario Shareholder Remedies Explained

In the intricate world of corporate law, shareholders possess a slew of rights. When these rights are jeopardized, or when the corporation’s actions seem unjust or prejudicial, shareholders can turn to specific remedies enshrined in the law.

Read More »
What Business Structure Should I Use in Ontario | Toronto Business Lawyers

What Business Structure Should I Use in Ontario?

Starting a business is a thrilling adventure, akin to setting out on an uncharted path. Every decision made at the outset lays the foundation for future success. One such pivotal decision is selecting the right business structure. This isn’t just a bureaucratic step; it shapes the very essence of your business, influencing liability, tax implications, operational processes, and more.

Read More »
Sublease vs Assignment

Assignment vs. Sublease in Commercial Tenancies

Navigating the complex landscape of commercial tenancies becomes even more intricate when terms like “assignment” and “sublease” emerge. While these terms may sometimes be used interchangeably by those less acquainted with property jargon, they embody distinct concepts with specific legal implications. Grasping the differences between them is vital for both tenants and landlords to facilitate seamless transitions and evade potential pitfalls.

Read More »
Online Trolls

Defamation in the Age of Online Trolls

The freedom of the internet allows for uninhibited self-expression. While many embrace this freedom to share positive stories, ideas, and feedback, others exploit it to spread malicious rumors or make derogatory comments without facing immediate consequences. The cloak of anonymity can embolden such individuals, making the internet a potential hotbed for defamation.

Read More »
Stolen Funds

Sase Aggregate: Court of Appeal’s Take on Stolen Funds

In the constantly evolving realm of legal jurisprudence, the case of Sase Aggregate Ltd. v. Langdon offers intriguing insights into the principles of knowing receipt, knowing assistance, and unjust enrichment. This article dives into why Sase Aggregate Ltd., the appellant, was unsuccessful in both its initial application to the lower court and its subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

Read More »
Selling Your Business

Selling Your Business: The Importance of Proper Valuation

For many business owners, the question “How much is my business actually worth?” weighs heavy on their minds. This is particularly true if you’re considering selling your business. The value of your business significantly influences the returns you receive from its sale. This factor not only affects your negotiation strategies but also has potential implications for your future financial well-being. The process of determining this value is known as business valuation, and it’s an intricate, multilayered exercise that requires expert knowledge.

Read More »

Defamation Law Explained: How the Parties’ Conduct Impacts Ontario Cases

When the invisible line of respect between individuals in society is crossed through defamatory comments, the law provides a remedy through defamation lawsuits. However, these cases are not black-and-white. Their outcomes can be influenced by the actions and behaviour of involved parties – both before and after the publication of the defamation. In Ontario, this scrutiny of conduct plays a pivotal role in shaping legal outcomes.

Read More »
Defamation Damages

How Defamation Damages Work in Ontario: A Detailed Look

Understanding defamation law, especially when considering the potential damages, is no small feat. The nuances and complexities can be overwhelming, yet having a clear comprehension of what the damages entail is invaluable for plaintiffs and defendants alike. In Ontario, defamation law encompasses three key types of damages: Aggravated, Special, and Punitive Damages.

Read More »
Parliamentary Privilege

Between Privilege and Liability: Ontario’s Lawmakers in the Balance

When we talk about “parliamentary privilege,” we refer to a set of rights and protections that enable lawmakers at the federal and provincial levels in Canada to perform their duties without fear of being legally liable. These privileges safeguard the democratic principles Canada is built upon, ensuring each branch of government respects the others’ roles.

Read More »
False Light Tort

Shedding Light on the False Light Tort

In 2019, Ontario recognized “publicity which places an individual in a false light” – the “false light tort” – as a part of the common law. Despite its relatively straightforward definition, the false light tort remains puzzling due to its ambiguous parameters, unique elements, and potential utility.

Read More »
Canadian Tax on Professional Athletes

Extra Points: The Game of Canadian Taxation for Athletes

How does Canadian tax law impact professional athletes? To understand this, we need to think about multiple scenarios, and consider the athlete’s residency, their affiliations with Canadian or foreign-based teams, and the ever-changing political landscape surrounding the taxation of sports franchises in Canada.

Read More »
Airline Liability

When Bags Fly: Airline Baggage and Cargo Liability

When your cargo or luggage gets damaged or lost during international air transport, you might think that the airline will compensate you for your losses. However, the legal landscape surrounding airline liability for international cargo and baggage is complex. It’s governed by international conventions like the Warsaw Convention and the Montreal Convention, which establish specific rules and liability limits for airlines.

Read More »
The Business Judgment Rule

The Business Judgment Rule: A Director’s Guide to Risky Business

The business judgment rule has its roots firmly planted in the need to facilitate an environment of innovation and growth in business. Recognizing that running a business often involves taking risks, this rule has been developed to shield directors and officers who are willing to take calculated chances to propel a corporation forward.

Read More »
Civil Fraud

Civil Fraud: The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Civil fraud, also known as deceit, is a serious economic tort or civil wrong that involves a deliberate deception through false representation. It requires four elements: a false representation by the defendant, their knowledge (or recklessness) of the falsehood, the plaintiff’s action influenced by this representation, and a loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result.

Read More »
Nevada's Court System

Silver State Justice: A Closer Look at Nevada’s Court System

The judicial system in Nevada plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring the fair administration of justice. The courts covered include Municipal Courts, Justice Courts, Small Claims Court, District Courts, Family Courts, and Appellate Courts, comprising the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Read More »
Insider Trading

Insider Intel: Navigating the Gray Areas of Insider Trading

An “insider” is broadly defined, including the corporation, directors, officers, major shareholders, employees, and professionals like lawyers or accountants. Liability extends to those receiving confidential information from insiders (tippees). Insiders cannot tip others for trading advantages. If an insider tips an unrelated person, they are liable for damages and accountable to the corporation for benefits received.

Read More »

Will ChatGPT Replace Lawyers?

In recent months, the rise of advanced artificial intelligence and natural language processing technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, has sparked a debate about their potential impact on various industries, including the legal profession. The million-dollar question inevitably arises: Will LLMs replace lawyers (and perhaps judges also), or at the very least, lead to a massive paradigm shift in law practice?

Read More »
Apologies and Retractions in Defamation Law

Sorry, Not Sorry: Apologies & Retractions in Defamation Law

In defamation cases, an apology may play a crucial role in the assessment of damages. However, it is important to note that courts lack the jurisdiction to order defendants to apologize. The existence of an apology, the sincerity of the defendant, and the extent of the publicity given to the apology are factors that courts consider when determining damages.

Read More »
Tracing Commingled Funds - The Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule

Tracing Commingled Funds: Unraveling the LIBR Mystery

The Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule (“LIBR“) is an essential concept in the legal world, particularly in cases involving the tracing of funds. It is an evidential rule that assumes that when a person commingles their own funds with funds belonging to someone else, they are assumed to have spent their own funds first.

Read More »
Equitable Fraud

Unconscientious, Unconscionable, Unfair: Equitable Fraud

Traditionally, fraud has been understood as involving deceit or intentional misrepresentation. However, the courts have expanded the concept to encompass equitable or constructive fraud, which includes various forms of unfair dealing and unconscionable conduct in contractual matters.

Read More »
Abuse of Power

Suing a City: Abuse of Power Lawsuits

Yes, believe it or not, you can sue a city. Municipal corporations, which include cities, are no longer immune to liability as they were in the past. They can be held accountable for various wrongdoings, such as tortious acts, breaches of contract, and neglecting statutory duties.

Read More »
Property Damage Claims

Rylands v. Fletcher: Property Damage Claims

Rylands v. Fletcher is a landmark case in English tort law that established the principle of strict liability for certain harmful activities. The rule states that a person who uses their land for non-natural purposes and accumulates a potentially dangerous substance on their property may be held strictly liable if that substance escapes and causes damage to another’s property.

Read More »
Notice Requirements

The Fine Print: Notice Requirements in Ontario Defamation Law

In Ontario, special notice requirements apply to defamation cases involving libel in a newspaper printed and published in the province or a broadcast from a station within Ontario. Plaintiffs must provide written notice to the defendant within six weeks after becoming aware of the alleged libel.

Read More »
Tort of Conversion

The Battle for Chattel: Understanding the Tort of Conversion

The tort of conversion primarily deals with the unlawful interference of another person’s movable personal property, known as chattels. In contrast to trespass to goods, conversion demands more than just a simple invasion of the plaintiff’s possessory rights; it necessitates an interference that denies the plaintiff’s title.

Read More »
The Principal Residence Exemption

The Principal Residence Exemption

The term “principal residence” refers to a taxpayer’s primary dwelling or housing unit for a specific tax year. The taxpayer, their spouse, common-law partner, former spouse, or child must ordinarily inhabit the residence. A personal trust can also claim a principal residence if it is regularly occupied by a specified beneficiary or their immediate family.

Read More »

From Threats to Torts: The Law on Intimidation

The tort of intimidation, a relatively less explored area of common law, has been recognized and established through a series of judicial decisions. The House of Lords in Rookes v. Barnard (“Rookes“) formally acknowledged the existence of this tort, which has since been accepted as part of the common law in Canada.

Read More »
Cosmetics Business

Starting a Cosmetics Business: For Entrepreneurs

The Canadian cosmetics industry generates billions of dollars. In 2021, the cosmetics market in Canada generated approximately USD 1.24 billion in revenue, and industry revenue is expected to grow by 1.45% annually to reach USD 1.8 billion by 2024.

Read More »
Domestic Contracts

Domestic Contracts: Essential Knowledge for Ontario Couples

Ontario’s Family Law Act (“FLA”) contains provisions under Part IV that regulate domestic contracts, including cohabitation agreements, marriage contracts, and separation agreements. These agreements primarily focus on legally enforceable matters, such as property division, spousal support, and children’s education.

Read More »
Shareholder Loans

The Tax Maze: How Shareholder Loans Impact Your Taxes

According to Section 15(2) of the Income Tax Act, a shareholder (or a person or partnership connected to the shareholder) may be deemed to have received a taxable benefit equal to the amount of a loan or debt made by a corporation. This taxable benefit is included in the shareholder’s income for the tax year in which the loan or debt arose.

Read More »
Internet Communication

Is Internet Communication a Broadcast in Defamation?

Over time, Canadian provincial legislation regulating defamation has been updated to incorporate modern communication methods. However, since most of this legislation does not explicitly address the Internet, judges are often required to draw parallels between Internet communications and traditional media forms, such as newspapers and broadcasts, that are covered by the legislation.

Read More »
Incorporating in Ontario

The Entrepreneur’s Roadmap to Incorporating in Ontario

Incorporating a company in Ontario has become more streamlined and accessible thanks to the introduction of the Ontario Business Registry on October 19, 2021. This guide will provide a detailed overview of the incorporation process, from preparing and submitting the required documentation to understanding the fees and legal obligations involved.

Read More »
I was sued

I Was Sued, Now What? (A Step-by-Step Guide)

Litigation is a complex process that requires careful attention to detail and a thorough understanding of the rules and procedures that govern the legal system. In this blog post, we explore the various stages of a lawsuit in Ontario, from the initial pleadings to the final trial.

Read More »
Class Action Certification

All for One, and One for All: Class Action Certification in Canada

In the Canadian legal landscape, class actions represent a powerful mechanism for individuals who have suffered similar harm or losses to collectively seek legal redress against a common defendant. These lawsuits serve multiple purposes, such as providing access to justice for people who might not have the means to pursue individual litigation, encouraging behavioural modification in large corporations or organizations, and promoting judicial efficiency by consolidating numerous related cases into a single legal action.

Read More »
Shareholders' Agreement

Drafting an Effective Shareholders’ Agreement

An essential contract for small non-offering corporations, shareholders’ agreements define the rights, privileges, liabilities, and responsibilities of each shareholder. These agreements, also known as “unanimous shareholders’ agreements,” offer a framework to govern various aspects of a corporation’s functioning, such as delineating shareholder roles, placing limitations on certain actions, and regulating share transfers.

Read More »