When Can You Discontinue an Action in Ontario?

When a plaintiff wants to discontinue an action against a defendant before the close of pleadings in Ontario, they have the right to do so by serving a Notice of Discontinuance on all parties served with a statement of claim and filing the notice with proof of service in the registrar’s office.
Businesswoman hands working in Stacks of paper files for searching and checking unfinished document

How to Discontinue an Action Before the Close of Pleadings

When a plaintiff wants to discontinue an action against a defendant before the close of pleadings in Ontario, they have the right to do so by serving a Notice of Discontinuance on all parties served with a statement of claim and filing the notice with proof of service in the registrar’s office. Rule 25.05 governs the close of pleadings and provides that pleadings are closed when the plaintiff has delivered a reply to every defence in the action or the time for delivery of a reply has expired, and every defendant who is in default in delivering a defence in the action has been noted in default. It’s worth noting that if a defendant has not been served with a statement of claim, the plaintiff isn’t required to serve the notice of discontinuance on that defendant. Additionally, it’s not possible for any party or the court to compel another party to discontinue an action, and so long as a limitation period hasn’t expired or the plaintiff is not prohibited from doing so, they can commence a further action.

How to Discontinue an Action After the Close of Pleadings

The ability of a plaintiff to discontinue an action without leave of the court is limited to a certain stage in the proceedings, after which the court must consider all relevant circumstances in deciding whether or not to grant leave to discontinue. The court must balance and weigh the rights and interests of both parties, taking into account the potential prejudice to each party. Prejudice may include the loss of evidence or witnesses, the denial of a trial, and the potential for further litigation. If the court decides to grant leave to discontinue, it may impose terms to address any prejudice to the defendant. The court may also refuse leave to discontinue if there is a concern of abuse or substantial prejudice to the defendant, which would require compelling evidence from the opposing party. If a plaintiff seeks to discontinue an action for the purpose of circumventing an interim order or to evade the effect of an order, it may be considered an abuse of process. In such cases, the plaintiff may be required to provide an undertaking not to bring any further actions for the same cause of action.

Considering discontinuing a legal action in Ontario? Ensure you're making the right move.

Talk to a Civil Litigation Lawyer

Share:

More Posts

When Does the Limitation Period Start for a Defamation Claim Stemming from False Police Reports?

The ruling in Kulyk v. Guastella reminds us of the importance of timely dealing with civil defamation claims, regardless of concurrent criminal proceedings. Justice Myers’ decision, grounded in the interpretation of the Limitations Act, emphasizes an objective standard for initiating defamation claims. Potential plaintiffs must therefore remain vigilant and proactive in protecting their legal rights against defamatory accusations, even amidst criminal proceedings.

toronto breach of contract lawyers

How to Plead Fraud: An Outline for Anyone Involved in a Fraud Claim

Pleading fraud requires clarity, precision, and a well-documented factual basis. While the potential for recovering consequential or even punitive damages can be attractive, the risks of dismissal and adverse cost implications underscore the need for a meticulously prepared claim.

10 Things to Know About Passing Off and Unfair Competition in Canada

Businesses of every size invest substantial time and money into developing their brand, trade names, and goodwill. Whether it’s a distinctive logo, a well-recognized label, a slogan that resonates with customers, or even a unique style of packaging, these assets help a business establish its identity and build a loyal consumer base. When others attempt to imitate or capitalize on this reputation—confusing the public in the process—the law of passing off and unfair competition in Canada comes into play.

Worried shareholder analyzing stock prices on online market from business office

Shareholder Rights in Ontario: An Overview

Shareholder rights in Ontario rest on a framework that includes corporate statutes like the OBCA and CBCA, the corporation’s own governing documents, and common law principles developed through years of judicial precedent. These rights ensure that individuals who invest in a company have some means of monitoring its activities, participating in major decisions, and seeking redress if those at the helm engage in improper or unfair conduct.

Civil Litigation - Business Law - Appeals

Ready to
move forward?

Ready to retain exceptional legal representation in Toronto? Contact Grigoras Law today—experience strategic counsel, meticulous advocacy, and personalized solutions tailored specifically to your legal needs.

Confidential consultation

09000 00000

65 Queen Street west, Suite 1240, toronto, Ontario M5H 2M5

Requeast a Consulastion

our team of experienced lawyers are at your service

Skip to content