The Self-Contained World of Letters of Credit

Letters of credit (LC) and bank guarantees are financial tools used to secure payment obligations. However, they differ from regular guarantees in terms of the defences against payment demands. An LC is simply an agreement to pay under certain conditions, and the law governing LCs is determined by the national jurisdiction where the LC is issued.
Busy Indian business man reading financial paper checking report in office.

Letters of credit (LC) and bank guarantees are financial tools used to secure payment obligations. However, they differ from regular guarantees in terms of the defences against payment demands. An LC is simply an agreement to pay under certain conditions, and the law governing LCs is determined by the national jurisdiction where the LC is issued.

There are two primary types of LCs: documentary credits and standby letters of credit. Both require the issuer (generally a bank) to pay a third party upon acceptance and payment of a bill of exchange submitted by that third party. The issuer also has the authority to accept or negotiate the documents presented by the third party.

Documentary credits entail a bank’s commitment to pay a specified amount of money, either immediately or at a future date, in exchange for specified documents presented by the third party. On the other hand, standby letters of credit serve as a backup source of payment in the event of non-payment or non-performance by the primary obligor. Payment obligations are typically activated by a written demand along with evidence of default in the underlying transaction.

Documentary credits are typically created with the purpose of making a payment upon presentation of the required documents. Standby letters of credit, however, are supplementary credit instruments that are meant to be honoured only if default occurs and are often used in foreign structured finance arrangements to ensure payment can be made within the intended jurisdiction without transferring funds.

The LC is a contract and is governed by the Uniform Customs and Practices (UCP) and international banking standards, which are recognized by Canadian law. Conflicts of laws are rare in LCs, with the UCP being the sole reference to choice of law. However, local jurisdiction may still apply to certain aspects of the LC.

For proper LC application, three interlocking principles must be considered. First, the LC is a separate contract, distinct from the underlying business transactions between the applicant and beneficiary and from the reimbursement agreement between the applicant and issuer. Second, the LC is self-contained, and no other agreements or documents should be referenced. Lastly, all LCs are document-based, and the issuer deals exclusively with documents. The LC transaction is considered complete if the draft and other documents outlined in the LC text are presented.

Share:

More Posts

Offers to Settle in Ontario Litigation

Rule 49 offers to settle are a cornerstone of civil litigation in Ontario. They reflect a deliberate policy choice to encourage settlement and reduce the burden of trials. By attaching significant costs consequences to the rejection of reasonable offers, the rule compels litigants to weigh the risks of trial carefully.

Cross-Examination at Trial

Cross-examination is widely regarded as one of the most powerful tools in the trial process. It is not only a feature of the adversarial system but a defining characteristic that sets it apart from other legal traditions. Through cross-examination, the evidence of witnesses is tested for accuracy, reliability, and truthfulness. Where examination-in-chief allows a party to present its own case in an orderly fashion, cross-examination permits opposing counsel to probe, challenge, and, where appropriate, dismantle that account.

When Does the Limitation Period Start for a Defamation Claim Stemming from False Police Reports?

The ruling in Kulyk v. Guastella reminds us of the importance of timely dealing with civil defamation claims, regardless of concurrent criminal proceedings. Justice Myers’ decision, grounded in the interpretation of the Limitations Act, emphasizes an objective standard for initiating defamation claims. Potential plaintiffs must therefore remain vigilant and proactive in protecting their legal rights against defamatory accusations, even amidst criminal proceedings.

Civil Litigation - Business Law - Appeals
Ready to move forward?
Ready to retain exceptional legal representation? Contact Grigoras Law today and experience strategic counsel, meticulous advocacy, and personalized solutions tailored specifically to your legal situation.
INTAKE FORM

Confidential consultation

09000 00000

65 Queen Street west, Suite 1240, toronto, Ontario M5H 2M5

Requeast a Consulastion

our team of experienced lawyers are at your service

Skip to content