The Self-Contained World of Letters of Credit

Letters of credit (LC) and bank guarantees are financial tools used to secure payment obligations. However, they differ from regular guarantees in terms of the defences against payment demands. An LC is simply an agreement to pay under certain conditions, and the law governing LCs is determined by the national jurisdiction where the LC is issued.
Busy Indian business man reading financial paper checking report in office.

Letters of credit (LC) and bank guarantees are financial tools used to secure payment obligations. However, they differ from regular guarantees in terms of the defences against payment demands. An LC is simply an agreement to pay under certain conditions, and the law governing LCs is determined by the national jurisdiction where the LC is issued.

There are two primary types of LCs: documentary credits and standby letters of credit. Both require the issuer (generally a bank) to pay a third party upon acceptance and payment of a bill of exchange submitted by that third party. The issuer also has the authority to accept or negotiate the documents presented by the third party.

Documentary credits entail a bank’s commitment to pay a specified amount of money, either immediately or at a future date, in exchange for specified documents presented by the third party. On the other hand, standby letters of credit serve as a backup source of payment in the event of non-payment or non-performance by the primary obligor. Payment obligations are typically activated by a written demand along with evidence of default in the underlying transaction.

Documentary credits are typically created with the purpose of making a payment upon presentation of the required documents. Standby letters of credit, however, are supplementary credit instruments that are meant to be honoured only if default occurs and are often used in foreign structured finance arrangements to ensure payment can be made within the intended jurisdiction without transferring funds.

The LC is a contract and is governed by the Uniform Customs and Practices (UCP) and international banking standards, which are recognized by Canadian law. Conflicts of laws are rare in LCs, with the UCP being the sole reference to choice of law. However, local jurisdiction may still apply to certain aspects of the LC.

For proper LC application, three interlocking principles must be considered. First, the LC is a separate contract, distinct from the underlying business transactions between the applicant and beneficiary and from the reimbursement agreement between the applicant and issuer. Second, the LC is self-contained, and no other agreements or documents should be referenced. Lastly, all LCs are document-based, and the issuer deals exclusively with documents. The LC transaction is considered complete if the draft and other documents outlined in the LC text are presented.

Share:

More Posts

Screen displaying social media platform icons representing online platform liability for defamatory reviews in Canadian law

Can You Sue Google for a Defamatory Review? What Canadian Law Says

A false review on Google Maps can reach thousands of people and stay there indefinitely. The person behind it may be anonymous and untraceable. Can you sue Google instead? Recent Canadian decisions in Thorpe v. Boakye and Jeffery v. Almusslat suggest the answer is increasingly yes, where the platform had notice, had control, and chose not to act.

What Every Director Needs to Know: Board Governance and Legal Obligations in Canada

The board of directors sits at the centre of Canadian corporate governance, bearing ultimate legal responsibility for how a corporation is managed. This article covers the statutory requirements for board composition, the meaning of director independence, what powers the board can and cannot delegate, and how unanimous shareholders’ agreements redistribute duties and liabilities between directors and shareholders.

Rows of bankers boxes on shelves representing third-party document disclosure in a Norwich Order application

Unmasking the Wrongdoer: Norwich Orders in Canadian Civil Litigation

When you know a wrong has been committed but cannot identify who did it, ordinary civil procedure offers no path forward. The Norwich Order fills that gap. It compels a third party mixed up in wrongdoing to disclose information before proceedings start, allowing a victim to identify a wrongdoer, trace stolen assets, or confirm whether a cause of action exists. This article explains the test, the limits, and how the remedy works in practice.

Pinocchio's nose growing as a metaphor for fraud by silence and concealment in Canadian law

What You Don’t Say: Fraudulent Concealment and the Duty to Disclose in Canadian Law

Silence is generally not fraud — but in a meaningful range of circumstances it is, and the consequences are identical to an outright lie. This article explains when Canadian courts will find that a party’s failure to speak is actionable fraud, what duty to disclose arises and from what relationships, how half-truths are treated, and how fraudulent concealment can suspend limitation periods that would otherwise bar a claim.

Confidential consultation

09000 00000

65 Queen Street west, Suite 1240, toronto, Ontario M5H 2M5

Requeast a Consulastion

our team of experienced lawyers are at your service