Global Mobility and Tax Residency: A Canadian Perspective

As the world becomes more connected, it’s becoming more common for Canadians to spend extended periods of time outside of Canada. With careful planning, it’s possible for Canadians to cease being a resident for Canadian income tax purposes, without giving up their Canadian citizenship.
An Asian woman travels abroad by plane,sitting window. She listens music while flying, looks phone

As the world becomes more connected, it’s becoming more common for Canadians to spend extended periods of time outside of Canada. With careful planning, it’s possible for Canadians to cease being a resident for Canadian income tax purposes, without giving up their Canadian citizenship.

When it comes to taxes, Canada and the United States have different rules. Canada taxes its residents on their worldwide income, but only if they are “ordinarily resident” in Canada or spend 183 or more days in the country in a calendar year. On the other hand, the United States taxes not just its residents, but also its citizens, on a worldwide basis. This means that if a U.S. citizen who is also a Canadian resident stops being a resident of Canada, they will still be liable to pay U.S. taxes, regardless of where they live.

When a Canadian stops being a resident of Canada, they will no longer be taxed on their worldwide income. However, Canada will still retain the right to tax certain Canadian source income, such as income earned from businesses carried on in Canada, real estate, and capital gains on taxable Canadian property.

When spending significant time in another country, it’s possible to meet the residency test of that country. This can lead to the possibility of being taxed by both countries, in the case of Canada and the other country both claiming the individual as a resident. This potential “double tax” problem is usually resolved through comprehensive double tax treaties between Canada and other countries, including the United States, Ireland and the United Kingdom. These treaties set out a series of residency tie-breaker tests, which help determine which country the individual has closer ties to and is therefore considered a tax resident.

However, Canada does not have income tax treaties with countries that do not have an income tax system, such as some Caribbean countries. In these cases, it’s crucial for Canadian residents to ensure that they don’t spend 183 days or more in Canada, and are not considered ordinarily resident in the country, as there will be no tax treaty to assist in breaking the tie.

Determining whether an individual is “ordinarily resident” in Canada is based on a number of Canadian income tax decisions. There are practical steps that can be taken to ensure that one is no longer considered ordinarily resident in Canada, such as severing ties with the country, like getting rid of a permanent home, and having closer personal and economic ties to another country.

In conclusion, it’s important for Canadians who spend significant time outside of Canada to be aware of the tax implications and plan accordingly. While it’s possible to cease being a Canadian resident for tax purposes, it’s important to consider how it may affect taxes in other countries and take steps to avoid double taxation. With the help of double tax treaties and by ensuring that you don’t meet the residency test of other countries, you can avoid these problems.

Share:

More Posts

When Does the Limitation Period Start for a Defamation Claim Stemming from False Police Reports?

The ruling in Kulyk v. Guastella reminds us of the importance of timely dealing with civil defamation claims, regardless of concurrent criminal proceedings. Justice Myers’ decision, grounded in the interpretation of the Limitations Act, emphasizes an objective standard for initiating defamation claims. Potential plaintiffs must therefore remain vigilant and proactive in protecting their legal rights against defamatory accusations, even amidst criminal proceedings.

toronto breach of contract lawyers

How to Plead Fraud: An Outline for Anyone Involved in a Fraud Claim

Pleading fraud requires clarity, precision, and a well-documented factual basis. While the potential for recovering consequential or even punitive damages can be attractive, the risks of dismissal and adverse cost implications underscore the need for a meticulously prepared claim.

10 Things to Know About Passing Off and Unfair Competition in Canada

Businesses of every size invest substantial time and money into developing their brand, trade names, and goodwill. Whether it’s a distinctive logo, a well-recognized label, a slogan that resonates with customers, or even a unique style of packaging, these assets help a business establish its identity and build a loyal consumer base. When others attempt to imitate or capitalize on this reputation—confusing the public in the process—the law of passing off and unfair competition in Canada comes into play.

Worried shareholder analyzing stock prices on online market from business office

Shareholder Rights in Ontario: An Overview

Shareholder rights in Ontario rest on a framework that includes corporate statutes like the OBCA and CBCA, the corporation’s own governing documents, and common law principles developed through years of judicial precedent. These rights ensure that individuals who invest in a company have some means of monitoring its activities, participating in major decisions, and seeking redress if those at the helm engage in improper or unfair conduct.

Civil Litigation - Business Law - Appeals
Ready to move forward?
Ready to retain exceptional legal representation? Contact Grigoras Law today and experience strategic counsel, meticulous advocacy, and personalized solutions tailored specifically to your legal situation.
INTAKE FORM

Confidential consultation

09000 00000

65 Queen Street west, Suite 1240, toronto, Ontario M5H 2M5

Requeast a Consulastion

our team of experienced lawyers are at your service

Skip to content