Contract Formation: Basic Training

The Canadian Encyclopedic Digest defines a contract as: “an agreement free from vitiating factors such as mistake or misrepresentation, and constituted by the unconditional acceptance of an outstanding offer involving a reasonably precise and complete set of terms between two or more contractually competent parties, who intend to create mutual and reciprocal rights and duties that may be the subject of judicial sanction, if they are expressed in any required form, and are free from the taint of illegality or immorality, and are not subsequently discharged by law, by agreement, by breach, or by sufficient supervening circumstances.”

Welcome to basic training in contract formation. When we think of contracts, we think of lengthy written agreements containing fine print and legal mumbo-jumbo. Most of us don’t even read through all the terms, almost as a matter of convention!  When you rent a car, do you sit there and read through all the terms and conditions before signing the document and getting into your car?  Probably not.  When you open a bank account, do you read through all the fine print pertaining to your new account before you sign?  Unlikely.

And, practically-speaking, this ultimately doesn’t affect many of us.  We return the rented car, undamaged, filled with the same amount of gas that it had when we picked it up.  We deposit and withdraw money into and from our bank account and pay our monthly account fees.  Etcetera.  Life goes on.

But, when things go wrong, we end up having to look at the terms of the contract.  And we end up learning (oftentimes the hard way) after-the-fact the terms we agreed to.

So, the terms of a contract are important.  But what exactly is a contract?  And how and when is one even formed?  There are all sorts of rules that can get quite complex, but let’s try to get a hold of the basics in contract formation.

Contract Formation – What’s a Contract?

A contract is a binding agreement between two or more people that gives rise to an enforceable obligation.

The Canadian Encyclopedic Digest defines a contract as: “an agreement free from vitiating factors such as mistake or misrepresentation, and constituted by the unconditional acceptance of an outstanding offer involving a reasonably precise and complete set of terms between two or more contractually competent parties, who intend to create mutual and reciprocal rights and duties that may be the subject of judicial sanction, if they are expressed in any required form, and are free from the taint of illegality or immorality, and are not subsequently discharged by law, by agreement, by breach, or by sufficient supervening circumstances.”  What a mouthful!

Contract Formation – Components

There are four components to contract formation:

(1) Authority, Capacity, and Power;

(2) Mutual Assent (an Offer and Acceptance);

(3) Consideration; and

(4) Free from Vitiating Factors.

Authority, Capacity, and Power

This refers to the person signing the contract, usually on behalf of a company.

Authority is exactly what is sounds like – for example, does the person/representative have authorization to bind the company?  This usually involves the powers that are delegated by a company to its representative, and the authority can be express or implied.  Even if a company employee lacked actual authority, he or she may have had apparent authority (based on an appearance of authority) to bind the company.

Capacity refers to the legal capacity of a person to enter into a contract – for example, a person who is mentally incompetent, a minor, etc., cannot enter into a contract.

Power refers to a company and whether that company has the power to enter into a contract.  A company’s power to enter into a contract may be limited by its bylaws or by any special business licence, etc.

Mutual Assent (an Offer and Acceptance)

You need the following two components to form mutual assent:

(1) An Offer; and

(2) An Acceptance of the Offer;

An Offer is: a willingness by one party (the Offeror) to enter into a contract for goods or services (or both), communicated in a way that the other party (the Offeree) understands the terms of the offer, verbal or written.  Beware because the Offeree can become the Offeror if the Offeree doesn’t agree to the terms of the offer and makes a counter-offer.

The offer must then be accepted.  Acceptance means the other party responds in a way that the first party clearly knows that the other has accepted and agrees to the essential terms that were being proposed.

Consideration

Consideration means that the parties must exchange something of value.  Basically, the act or promise of one party must be “bought” or “bargained for” by the act or promise of the other party.  Consideration can be in the form of a promise to perform an act . . . or not to act; it can be cash or cash equivalent; or it can be an action or performance.  The important thing is that the consideration exchanged matches what the parties bargained for and agreed to (the exchange doesn’t need to be of equal value).

Consideration has been defined as “some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other.”[1]

No Vitiating Factors

There’s also legislation – like the Statute of Frauds – that makes certain contracts enforceable only if they’re in writing.  Many contracts are verbal, but some legislation protects parties from verbally negotiating and unintentionally entering into a contract by oral agreement.  Generally-speaking, contracts for the sale of goods over $500 must be in writing.  Contracts that can’t be performed in one year must be in writing.  Contracts involving marriage or real estate must be in writing.  And so on and so forth.

When something is “in writing,” the written correspondence (like email) must identify the parties, identify the essential terms, and demonstrate that the parties wanted to enter into a contract.  Some legislation even makes it a requirement that a document be signed.  But a signature can be any symbol, including a typed name at the end of an email (i.e. an electronic signature meets the legal threshold).

Besides the signature requirement, some contracts can be unenforceable because of the situation.  If there’s a mistake on the part of either party that doesn’t match up with the terms, that can render the contract unenforceable.  If there’s misrepresentation (a false or partially false assertion or, sometimes, non-disclosure/concealment), that can render the contract unenforceable.  If there’s duress or undue influence (where one party doesn’t act freely of their own volition or is improperly forced), that can render the contract unenforceable.  Finally, if the contract is illegal or contrary to public policy, that can render the contract unenforceable.

Recap

So, to form a contract, you need a binding offer by one person that’s accepted by another person, with the parties possessing authority, capacity, and power to bind, and with the parties each having exchanged something of value as part of the bargain.  Sometimes (but not always) the agreement must be in writing.  And the agreement can’t otherwise be unenforceable because of a mistake, misrepresentation, duress or undue influence, or illegality or a public policy reason.

Share:

More Posts

wo friends representing the personal relationship dynamic behind spousal and personal guarantees in Canadian commercial law

When the Guarantor Gets the Call: Understanding Guarantee Law in Canada

Guarantees are signed every day in commercial transactions — as a condition of a bank loan, a commercial lease, or a franchise agreement. They create serious personal liability, and they are often signed without full understanding of the risk. This article explains what guarantees are, what makes them enforceable, the defences available when a creditor calls on a guarantee, and the rights a guarantor has against both the creditor and the principal.

Clock representing time running out on limitation periods for civil lawsuits in Ontario

Limitation Periods in Ontario: How Long Do You Have to Sue?

If someone has wronged you, there is a window of time within which you can sue — and once it closes, it closes for good. Ontario’s limitation periods framework sets a two-year basic deadline running from discovery, and a fifteen-year ultimate cap. But the rules are more nuanced than they look. This guide explains when the clock starts, when it can be paused, how specific claims like defamation, personal injury, and contract disputes are treated, and what happens across the country.

Person crossing fingers behind their back representing bad faith and the clean hands doctrine in shareholder oppression remedy proceedings

The Clean Hands Doctrine and the Oppression Remedy: What Shareholders Need to Know

A minority shareholder who has themselves behaved badly may still succeed in an oppression claim — but the clean hands doctrine can limit or deny relief where the complainant’s own misconduct is directly connected to what they are asking the court to remedy. This article explains when the doctrine applies, when it does not, and what it means in practice for shareholder disputes.

Various currencies and banknotes representing money laundering and the proceeds of crime under Canadian anti-money laundering legislation

Canada’s Anti-Money Laundering Laws: Who Must Comply and What They Must Do

Money laundering is one of the most serious financial crimes in Canada — and the obligation to detect and report it falls on a surprisingly wide range of businesses. Banks, real estate agents, lawyers, accountants, casinos, and dealers in precious metals all have detailed compliance obligations under the PCMLTFA. This guide explains the law, who it applies to, and what the consequences of non-compliance are.

Confidential consultation

09000 00000

65 Queen Street west, Suite 1240, toronto, Ontario M5H 2M5

Requeast a Consulastion

our team of experienced lawyers are at your service