Canadian Class Actions: A Beginner’s Guide to Collective Litigation

Denis Grigoras

Denis is a lawyer who draws on his background in complex legal disputes and transactions to problem-solve for his clients.

Class action lawsuits serve as an important mechanism for plaintiffs in Canada to pursue legal remedies as a collective. This type of litigation offers a more efficient way to resolve disputes that share common issues.

Share Post:

Class Actions


Class action lawsuits serve as an important mechanism for plaintiffs in Canada to pursue legal remedies as a collective. This type of litigation offers a more efficient way to resolve disputes that share common issues. In this comprehensive guide, we will discuss the main aspects of class actions in detail, covering the initiation of proceedings, the certification process, litigation of common issues, addressing individual concerns, and the distribution of monetary awards.

I.  Starting a Class Action:

Initiating a class action lawsuit in Canada follows the same process as any other legal action. For instance, in Ontario, one would file a statement of claim or notice of application, while in British Columbia, a notice of civil claim, petition, or requisition is required. In Ontario, it is necessary to include the phrase “Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992” in the title of the proceedings.

Provincial differences in class action legislation:

Each province in Canada has its own class action legislation and rules, which can result in differences in procedure and outcomes. For example, Quebec’s class action regime is based on civil law, while the rest of the provinces follow common law principles. It is important for plaintiffs and their counsel to be aware of these differences when pursuing a class action.

Federal class actions:

In addition to provincial class actions, there are also federal class actions that can be pursued under the Federal Courts Act. These cases typically involve matters under federal jurisdiction, such as intellectual property disputes, competition law issues, and certain types of product liability claims. Federal class actions follow similar procedural rules to those in the provinces, but with some distinct differences that can impact the course and outcome of the litigation.

Pre-filing considerations:

Before initiating a class action, plaintiffs and their counsel should carefully consider the merits of the case, the composition of the potential class, and the likelihood of obtaining certification. This may involve conducting preliminary research, consulting with experts, and analyzing the potential damages that could be awarded to the class members.

II.  Obtaining Certification:

The certification process:

Before a case can progress as a class action, the court must certify it. The certification order will designate the representative plaintiff(s), outline the class, determine the common issues, and at least tentatively approve a feasible plan. It is crucial for class counsel to prepare a well-defined class description, a focused set of unambiguous common issues, and a comprehensive plan for managing the class action. Although courts may permit amendments to certification documents, class counsel should not presume that any shortcomings can be effortlessly rectified at a later stage.

Certification criteria:

In order to obtain certification, a proposed class action must typically meet several criteria, which can vary slightly between jurisdictions. These criteria often include:

  1. A discernible class of plaintiffs that can be readily identified.
  2. Common issues among class members that can be efficiently addressed through a class action.
  3. A suitable representative plaintiff who can fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class.
  4. A well-defined litigation plan that demonstrates the class action is the preferable procedure for resolving the common issues.
  5. No conflicts of interest among class members or between the class members and the representative plaintiff.

The certification hearing:

The certification hearing is a crucial step in the class action process, where the court will decide whether the case should be allowed to proceed as a class action. At this hearing, the representative plaintiff and their counsel must present evidence and arguments supporting the certification of the class action, while the defendant(s) may present counterarguments and evidence to challenge the certification.

Appealing a certification decision:

If a court denies certification, the representative plaintiff may seek to appeal the decision to a higher court.

III.  Procedural Differences between Provinces:

Pre-certification requirements:

In most Canadian provinces, a proceeding is not considered a class action until it has been certified by the courts. In contrast, in Ontario, a matter that is initiated as a class action must undergo certification to proceed as one. Regardless of certification, actions initiated under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, are deemed class proceedings, necessitating the courts to handle them in specified ways. For instance, even before certification, court approval is required for discontinuance. This requirement also applies to proceedings initiated under Alberta legislation, despite the province’s differing definition of a class proceeding.

Discontinuance and conversion to a regular proceeding:

In Mewburn v. Peers, the court ruled that once an action had been formally initiated as a class action, regardless of certification, it could not be discontinued or converted to a regular proceeding without court approval. This ruling was based on the court approval requirement outlined in section 35 of the Act, which applies to proceedings that are “the subject of an application for certification.” The court interpreted this to include any action initiated as a class action since all such actions must undergo an application for certification. Consequently, this decision aligns Alberta’s law on discontinuance of actions initiated as class proceedings with that of Ontario.

IV.  Common Issues Litigation:

Post-certification process:

Once a class action has been certified, it will proceed similarly to a traditional lawsuit, involving documentary and oral discovery, pre-trial motions, and the exchange of expert reports. These steps aim to resolve the common issues identified during the certification process.

Pre-trial case management:

Class actions are often subject to case management by the courts, which involves active judicial oversight to ensure that the litigation proceeds efficiently and fairly. This may include setting deadlines, scheduling pre-trial conferences, and managing disputes over document production, discovery, and expert evidence. Effective case management can help to streamline the litigation process and promote a timely resolution of the common issues.

Motion practice:

During the course of a class action, the parties may bring various motions before the court to address procedural or substantive issues. These may include motions to compel document production or discovery, motions to amend the pleadings, and motions for summary judgment. The outcome of these motions can have a significant impact on the course and outcome of the litigation.

Settlement negotiations and mediation:

Many class actions are resolved through settlement rather than trial. This can involve direct negotiations between the parties, as well as mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution. Settlements must be approved by the court to ensure that they are fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the class members.

V.  Individual Issues:

Addressing individual issues:

Following the resolution of the common issues, it may be necessary to address individual issues that are specific to particular class members. The class action legislation provides courts with discretion to determine individual issues through further hearings, the appointment of a referee under the rules of court, or any other method deemed appropriate.

Individual assessments:

In some cases, individual assessments may be required to determine the extent of each class member’s damages or entitlement to other forms of relief. These assessments can be time-consuming and complex, particularly in cases involving large numbers of class members or varying degrees of harm. The courts may establish procedures for conducting individual assessments in an efficient and fair manner, such as through the use of standardized forms, templates, or questionnaires.

Opting out and individual litigation:

In most Canadian class actions, class members have the option to “opt-out” of the class action and pursue their claims individually. This may be an attractive option for class members who believe that they have a strong case and would prefer to control their own litigation rather than relying on the representative plaintiff and class counsel. However, individual litigation can be expensive and time-consuming, and opting out carries the risk that the individual claimant may not achieve a better outcome than they would have received through the class action. Class members considering opting out should carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks before making a decision.

VI.  Distribution of Monetary Awards:

Post-common issues resolution:

Often, after resolving the common issues, further procedures are necessary to determine individual liability and establish a method for distributing awarded amounts to individual class members. Courts have broad discretion to arrange for the distribution of monetary relief through “any means authorized by the court.” This can include court-ordered mediation, the appointment of a third-party administrator, or a simple mathematical division among class members.

Case management after common issues resolution:

The 2022 Ontario Court decision of Cavanaugh v. Grenville Christian College demonstrates the wide discretion given to the case management court following a judgment on the common issues. In this case, Justice Perell established an extensive process, referred to as an “Individual Issues Litigation Plan,” which allowed approximately 1,400 class members to move their individual cases toward completion.

Notice to class members:

Once a class action has been certified, and a settlement or judgment has been reached, class members must be notified of the outcome and provided with information about their rights and options, including the process for submitting claims and the deadline for doing so. This notice may be provided through direct mail, email, publication in newspapers or online, or any other method approved by the court.

Claims administration:

The administration of claims in a class action can be a complex and time-consuming process, particularly in cases involving large numbers of class members or complicated calculations of individual damages. Third-party claims administrators may be appointed by the court to manage the claims process, including the review and verification of claims forms, the calculation of individual awards, and the distribution of funds to eligible class members.

Cy-près distributions:

In some class actions, it may not be possible or practical to distribute all of the funds from a settlement or judgment to individual class members. In these cases, the courts may approve a cy-près distribution, which involves the allocation of the remaining funds to a charitable organization or other entity that serves the interests of the class members. This can provide a means of indirectly benefiting the class members and promoting the underlying objectives of the class action.


Canadian class actions provide an important avenue for plaintiffs to seek collective redress for shared grievances. Understanding the intricacies of the class action process, from commencement to distribution of monetary awards, is vital for both plaintiffs and their legal counsel. As class actions continue to evolve in Canada, staying informed about the latest developments in legislation, case law, and best practices can help ensure that class actions remain an effective tool for achieving justice for those who have been wronged.

By gaining a comprehensive understanding of the Canadian class action landscape, plaintiffs and their legal counsel can navigate the complexities of the process more effectively, increasing the likelihood of a favourable outcome. With thorough preparation and strategic planning, class actions can serve as a powerful means to hold wrongdoers accountable and deliver justice to those who have been harmed by their actions.

Have you been affected by a shared grievance and considering joining a class action in Canada? Understand your rights and the process.

Talk to a Civil Litigation Lawyer

Stay Connected

More Posts

Rule 21: The Road to a Speedy Resolution of Legal Proceedings

Rule 21 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure is a mechanism for dealing with situations where a claim brought by a plaintiff is clearly of a kind for which no legal relief is available or where the defence submitted by the defendant is not valid. The rule allows for the determination of certain preliminary issues that may dispose of a legal proceeding without the need for a trial to avoid delays and ensure that issues are disposed of promptly and in accordance with the Rules.

Read More »
Director Liability

Director Liability: Consenting to and Voting for Certain Resolutions

In Ontario, under the Ontario Business Corporations Act, directors of a corporation have a legal responsibility to ensure that the corporation is financially stable before making certain transactions. This includes the payment of dividends, redemption or reacquisition of shares, reduction of stated capital, or provision of financial assistance to certain non-arm’s length persons.

Read More »
Corporate Criminal Liability

From Boardroom to Courtroom: Corporate Criminal Liability

As a director or officer of a public corporation in Ontario, it’s crucial to be aware of the legal implications of your actions. The Criminal Code of Canada includes a number of provisions that pertain to fraud, and these can apply to those in leadership positions within a company.

Read More »
60 Days to Notify

60 Days Notice: Bill 118’s Impact on Personal Injury Claims

In Ontario, the Occupiers’ Liability Amendment Act, 2020, often known as Bill 118, made substantial modifications to the filing process for personal injury claims caused by snow or ice on private property. The modifications to the Occupiers’ Liability Act imposed new notification requirements on claimants.

Read More »

Conundrum of Crypto: Bankruptcy Law and Digital Assets

The question of how cryptocurrencies are classified under Canadian bankruptcy law has again been brought to the forefront with the collapse of Bahamas-based cryptocurrency exchange FTX . . . While there is broad acceptance that cryptocurrencies are likely assets, there is no widespread agreement on how to classify them – are they financial assets, intangible assets, inventory, investment property or something else?

Read More »
Rent Obligations in Receivership

Navigating Rent Obligations in Receivership Proceedings

When it comes to court-appointed receiverships, there can be much confusion surrounding the issue of rent obligations. Essentially, the main tension arises from the fact that existing legal principles don’t always align with what a receiver would like to do in practice.

Read More »
Rule 14.03 Filing Deadline

Failing to Meet Rule 14.03 Filing Deadline in Ontario Civil Cases

[W]hat happens if you do not file the statement of claim (Form 14D) within thirty days after the notice of action is issued, and you cannot get the defendant’s written consent to file it? Failure to file the statement of claim within 30 days of the notice of action being filed does not render the action a nullity.

Read More »
Consumer Protection Act of Ontario

Overview of the Consumer Protection Act of Ontario

The Consumer Protection Act, 2002 (“CPA”) is a piece of legislation in Ontario that was put in place to safeguard customers’ interests in their interactions with various commercial enterprises. If a consumer’s rights are infringed upon, it details the legal recourses available to them as well as the rights and responsibilities of both businesses and customers.

Read More »
Mental Injury

The Shift Towards Modern Proof in Mental Injury Cases

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saadati fundamentally altered the way in which tort law responds to mental injury by attempting to align it more closely with the way it sponds to physical injuries. In this particular case, the Court upheld a trial judge’s award for Mr. Saadati’s mental injury, despite the absence of a diagnosis of a recognized psychiatric illness.

Read More »
Intrusion Upon Seclusion

Intrusion Upon Seclusion: The State of Mind Requirement

The Court of Appeal in Owsinik provided further clarity on the first element of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion: the state of mind requirement. The prohibited state of mind, whether intention or recklessness, must exist when the defendant engages in the prohibited conduct.

Read More »
Section 167

The GST/HST Section 167 Election in Asset Purchase Deals

The GST/HST Section 167 Election is a clause that can be used in an asset purchase agreement to address the tax implications of purchasing a business. It grants the parties the ability to make a joint election for an exemption from the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) on the purchase of all or substantially all of a company’s assets, provided that certain conditions are satisfied.

Read More »
Spousal Liability for Tax Arrears

Spousal Liability for Tax Arrears: A Guide to Section 160 of the ITA

If you owe tax debt, it is imperative that you are familiar with the rules that are outlined in Section 160 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.). The Canada Revenue Agency has the authority under this provision to hold both the transferor and the transferee jointly and severally liable for any unpaid taxes that exist at the time of the property transfer.

Read More »
Rule 45

Using Rule 45 to Prevent the Disposal of Property

Rule 45 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure deals with the preservation of personal property that is relevant to a litigated issue. The goal of this rule is to prohibit the party who is currently in possession of the property from selling or otherwise getting rid of it before the matter has been resolved.

Read More »
Hague Service Convention

The Basics of the Hague Service Convention

The Hague Convention on Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965 (also known as the Hague Service Convention) is an international treaty that sets out the rules for serving judicial and extrajudicial documents abroad in civil or commercial matters.

Read More »
National Instruments

National Instruments: Securities Regulations for Investor Protection

The National Instruments are a comprehensive set of rules and regulations that apply to the securities industry in Canada. They are issued by the Canadian Securities Administrators, an umbrella body representing each province and territory’s securities regulators. The National Instruments are intended to strengthen investor protection and promote efficient capital markets.

Read More »
Lien on Lands for Improvements

Lien on Lands for Improvements Under Mistake of Title

Section 37 of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (the “Act”) of Ontario regulates the rights and responsibilities of parties in connection to liens on lands for improvements performed under a mistake of title.

A lien is a legal claim or right to a piece of property as security for the payment of a debt or other obligation, according to the Act. A lien on lands for improvements describes a circumstance in which a person has made improvements to a piece of property under the assumption that they are the owner or have some other legal interest in the property.

Read More »
Oppression Remedy

Oppression Remedy: Redress for Unfair Corporate Treatment

The oppression remedy is intended to offer shareholders, directors, and officers with a method to seek redress where they have been subjected to oppressive treatment by the corporation. This may include instances in which the corporation has operated in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of specific shareholders or has disregarded the rights of its directors or officers.

Read More »
Nevada Asset Protection Trust

The Nevada Asset Protection Trust

Asset protection planning is a process that involves organizing one’s affairs to prevent the loss of wealth due to legal actions, divorce, and taxes. To achieve this goal, many people have created asset protection trusts, which are legal arrangements that allow individuals to safeguard their assets, such as their home or other property, business, retirement funds, and children’s education savings. One type of asset protection trust that is available is the Nevada Asset Protection Trust.

Read More »
refusals and undertakings

Discovery Challenges: Undertakings and Refusals Motions

If a party fails to provide satisfactory responses or declines to address valid inquiries during the discovery or cross-examination process, a motion for undertakings and refusals might be needed. This motion requests the court’s intervention to compel the party being examined to comply with their undertakings or address questions that were inappropriately refused.

Read More »

Incorporating Your Business

An incorporated company is one of the most common ways of conducting a business. The corporation is a separate person in the eyes of the law – it’s a separate legal entity. It’s “separate” because it’s a separate legal entity from the people who own the corporation (who are called shareholders). It’s a “person” because it has the capacity, rights, powers, and privileges of a natural person.

Read More »

Contract Formation: Basic Training

The Canadian Encyclopedic Digest defines a contract as: “an agreement free from vitiating factors such as mistake or misrepresentation, and constituted by the unconditional acceptance of an outstanding offer involving a reasonably precise and complete set of terms between two or more contractually competent parties, who intend to create mutual and reciprocal rights and duties that may be the subject of judicial sanction, if they are expressed in any required form, and are free from the taint of illegality or immorality, and are not subsequently discharged by law, by agreement, by breach, or by sufficient supervening circumstances.”

Read More »
parliamentary privilege

Between Privilege and Liability: Ontario’s Lawmakers in the Balance

When we talk about “parliamentary privilege,” we refer to a set of rights and protections that enable lawmakers at the federal and provincial levels in Canada to perform their duties without fear of being legally liable. These privileges safeguard the democratic principles Canada is built upon, ensuring each branch of government respects the others’ roles.

Read More »
False Light Tort

Shedding Light on the False Light Tort

In 2019, Ontario recognized “publicity which places an individual in a false light” – the “false light tort” – as a part of the common law. Despite its relatively straightforward definition, the false light tort remains puzzling due to its ambiguous parameters, unique elements, and potential utility.

Read More »
Canadian Tax on Professional Athletes

Extra Points: The Game of Canadian Taxation for Athletes

How does Canadian tax law impact professional athletes? To understand this, we need to think about multiple scenarios, and consider the athlete’s residency, their affiliations with Canadian or foreign-based teams, and the ever-changing political landscape surrounding the taxation of sports franchises in Canada.

Read More »
Airline Liability

When Bags Fly: Airline Baggage and Cargo Liability

When your cargo or luggage gets damaged or lost during international air transport, you might think that the airline will compensate you for your losses. However, the legal landscape surrounding airline liability for international cargo and baggage is complex. It’s governed by international conventions like the Warsaw Convention and the Montreal Convention, which establish specific rules and liability limits for airlines.

Read More »
The Business Judgment Rule

The Business Judgment Rule: A Director’s Guide to Risky Business

The business judgment rule has its roots firmly planted in the need to facilitate an environment of innovation and growth in business. Recognizing that running a business often involves taking risks, this rule has been developed to shield directors and officers who are willing to take calculated chances to propel a corporation forward.

Read More »
equitable fraud

Civil Fraud: The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Civil fraud, also known as deceit, is a serious economic tort or civil wrong that involves a deliberate deception through false representation. It requires four elements: a false representation by the defendant, their knowledge (or recklessness) of the falsehood, the plaintiff’s action influenced by this representation, and a loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result.

Read More »
Nevada's Court System

Silver State Justice: A Closer Look at Nevada’s Court System

The judicial system in Nevada plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring the fair administration of justice. The courts covered include Municipal Courts, Justice Courts, Small Claims Court, District Courts, Family Courts, and Appellate Courts, comprising the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Read More »
Insider Trading

Insider Intel: Navigating the Gray Areas of Insider Trading

An “insider” is broadly defined, including the corporation, directors, officers, major shareholders, employees, and professionals like lawyers or accountants. Liability extends to those receiving confidential information from insiders (tippees). Insiders cannot tip others for trading advantages. If an insider tips an unrelated person, they are liable for damages and accountable to the corporation for benefits received.

Read More »

Will ChatGPT Replace Lawyers?

In recent months, the rise of advanced artificial intelligence and natural language processing technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, has sparked a debate about their potential impact on various industries, including the legal profession. The million-dollar question inevitably arises: Will LLMs replace lawyers (and perhaps judges also), or at the very least, lead to a massive paradigm shift in law practice?

Read More »

Sorry, Not Sorry: Apologies & Retractions in Defamation Law

In defamation cases, an apology may play a crucial role in the assessment of damages. However, it is important to note that courts lack the jurisdiction to order defendants to apologize. The existence of an apology, the sincerity of the defendant, and the extent of the publicity given to the apology are factors that courts consider when determining damages.

Read More »
tracing funds

Tracing Commingled Funds: Unraveling the LIBR Mystery

The Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule (“LIBR“) is an essential concept in the legal world, particularly in cases involving the tracing of funds. It is an evidential rule that assumes that when a person commingles their own funds with funds belonging to someone else, they are assumed to have spent their own funds first.

Read More »
Equitable Fraud

Unconscientious, Unconscionable, Unfair: Equitable Fraud

Traditionally, fraud has been understood as involving deceit or intentional misrepresentation. However, the courts have expanded the concept to encompass equitable or constructive fraud, which includes various forms of unfair dealing and unconscionable conduct in contractual matters.

Read More »
suing a city

Suing a City: Abuse of Power Lawsuits

Yes, believe it or not, you can sue a city. Municipal corporations, which include cities, are no longer immune to liability as they were in the past. They can be held accountable for various wrongdoings, such as tortious acts, breaches of contract, and neglecting statutory duties.

Read More »
Property Damage Claims

Rylands v. Fletcher: Property Damage Claims

Rylands v. Fletcher is a landmark case in English tort law that established the principle of strict liability for certain harmful activities. The rule states that a person who uses their land for non-natural purposes and accumulates a potentially dangerous substance on their property may be held strictly liable if that substance escapes and causes damage to another’s property.

Read More »
Notice of Libel Ontario

The Fine Print: Notice Requirements in Ontario Defamation Law

In Ontario, special notice requirements apply to defamation cases involving libel in a newspaper printed and published in the province or a broadcast from a station within Ontario. Plaintiffs must provide written notice to the defendant within six weeks after becoming aware of the alleged libel.

Read More »