<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure Archives - Toronto Civil &amp; Business Litigation Lawyers | Grigoras Law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grigoraslaw.com/tag/ontario-rules-of-civil-procedure/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grigoraslaw.com/tag/ontario-rules-of-civil-procedure</link>
	<description>Clear Vision. Bold Paths.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2025 03:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Using Rule 45 to Prevent the Disposal of Property</title>
		<link>https://grigoraslaw.com/using-rule-45-to-prevent-the-disposal-of-property</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grigoras Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 19:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grigoraslaw.com/?p=14110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rule 45 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure deals with the preservation of personal property that is relevant to a litigated issue.  The goal of this rule is to prohibit the party who is currently in possession of the property from selling or otherwise getting rid of it before the matter has been resolved.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com/using-rule-45-to-prevent-the-disposal-of-property">Using Rule 45 to Prevent the Disposal of Property</a> appeared first on <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com">Toronto Civil &amp; Business Litigation Lawyers | Grigoras Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="14110" class="elementor elementor-14110" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-1f7c22d5 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default" data-id="1f7c22d5" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-5e900a4" data-id="5e900a4" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7952da4d elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="7952da4d" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900194#BK421" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Rule 45 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure</strong></a> deals with the preservation of personal property that is relevant to a litigated issue.  The goal of this rule is to prohibit the party who is currently in possession of the property from selling or otherwise getting rid of it before the matter has been resolved. A preservation order is an extraordinary form of relief that is often issued with little or no prior warning. It is comparable to an Anton Piller order, which enables a party to inspect records and remove them into the custody of an interim receiver, and a Mareva injunction, which prevents a party from dealing with its own assets pending the determination of the proceeding.</p><p>Under Rule 45, the temporary preservation of property can be accomplished through one of three different forms of orders. Rule 45.01 enables the court to issue an interim order for the preservation or sale of property, as well as the authority to enter or search any property that is in the possession of a party or a non-party. Rule 45.02 allows for the payment of a specific money into court or the security of the fund &#8220;on such terms as are just.&#8221; The recovery of personal property that has been held as security is provided for under Rule 45.03.</p><p>In order to obtain a preservation order, the moving party must demonstrate that the property in question is relevant to the proceeding or an issue in the proceeding, that there is a serious issue to be tried with regard to the property, that the interim preservation or custody of the property is necessary for a party to either advance or defend its claim, and that the balance of convenience favours granting the relief sought by the applicant. In most cases, a motion for a preservation order is brought on an ex parte basis.</p><p>Because preservation orders are, in essence, demands for pre-judgment execution, the courts are notoriously reluctant to grant them. This is an important point to keep in mind. There must be a serious issue to be tried and the balance of convenience must favour granting the relief. Additionally, courts have the inherent authority to control the process of litigation, including the power to require the preservation of electronic records; this includes the ability to order the preservation of electronic documents. When there is a strong likelihood that the defendant will destroy evidence after being informed of the proceedings, it is common practice to file a motion for a preservation order in to ensure that significant evidence, such as documents, information, or other items, will be preserved and made accessible for the trial of the action in question.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com/using-rule-45-to-prevent-the-disposal-of-property">Using Rule 45 to Prevent the Disposal of Property</a> appeared first on <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com">Toronto Civil &amp; Business Litigation Lawyers | Grigoras Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Right to Discovery: When Can You Examine a Non-Party in Ontario?</title>
		<link>https://grigoraslaw.com/right-to-discovery-when-can-you-examine-a-non-party-in-ontario</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grigoras Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 18:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort Claims (Personal Injury)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examine a non-party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 31.10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort claims (personal Injury)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grigoraslaw.com/?p=14042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rule 31.10 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure provides for the right to examine a non-party. This rule allows a party to a legal action to request that a non-party to the action be examined for discovery purposes. Examining a non-party is done to gather information or evidence that may be relevant to the case.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com/right-to-discovery-when-can-you-examine-a-non-party-in-ontario">The Right to Discovery: When Can You Examine a Non-Party in Ontario?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com">Toronto Civil &amp; Business Litigation Lawyers | Grigoras Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="14042" class="elementor elementor-14042" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-43bad4de elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default" data-id="43bad4de" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-1da8bf05" data-id="1da8bf05" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5a616d14 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="5a616d14" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900194#BK306" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rule 31.10 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure</a> provides for the right to examine a non-party. This rule allows a party to a legal action to request that a non-party to the action be examined for discovery purposes.</p><p>Examining a non-party is done to gather information or evidence that may be relevant to the case. This includes documents or other materials in the non-possession, party&#8217;s as well as sworn testimony. The examination is conducted in the same manner as a discovery examination for a party to the action.</p><p>In order to examine a non-party under <a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900194#BK306" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rule 31.10</a>, several requirements must be met. To begin, the party requesting the examination must demonstrate that the non-party has relevant information or documents that cannot be obtained from any other source. The party must also demonstrate that the examination does not unfairly or unduly prejudice the non-party.</p><p>Using words like &#8220;extraordinary&#8221; or &#8220;exceptional&#8221; to describe the standard for obtaining permission to examine a non-party is not helpful. Rather, the focus should be on whether the requirements outlined in <a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900194#BK306" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rule 31.10(2)</a> have been met. If these conditions are met, the court has the discretion to decide whether to allow non-party discovery. If an examination is required for the proper administration of justice, the court should not hesitate to grant permission for it to be carried out.</p><p>Furthermore, the non-party must be notified of the examination, and the examination must be conducted in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. This includes providing a copy of the request for examination to the non-party and giving the non-party a reasonable opportunity to object to the examination.</p><p>The opposing party&#8217;s counsel (D) does not have the authority to object to questions directed at the non-party during the examination by the party (P). If the non-party objects to the examination, the party requesting the examination can ask the court to issue an order compelling the examination to take place. When deciding whether to grant the order, the court will consider the same factors outlined above.</p><p>It is important to note that a non-party examination does not replace other forms of discovery, such as interrogatories or document production. It is also not a means of harassing or annoying the non-party, nor is it a means of causing unnecessary expense. If a party abuses his or her right to examine a non-party, the court may impose sanctions such as costs or other penalties.</p><p>To summarize, the right to examine a non-party is a valuable tool for gathering relevant information or evidence in a legal proceeding. However, it is critical to ensure that all requirements for conducting such an examination are met and that the examination is not misused.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com/right-to-discovery-when-can-you-examine-a-non-party-in-ontario">The Right to Discovery: When Can You Examine a Non-Party in Ontario?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com">Toronto Civil &amp; Business Litigation Lawyers | Grigoras Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discovery Challenges: Undertakings and Refusals Motions</title>
		<link>https://grigoraslaw.com/motion-for-undertakings-and-refusals</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grigoras Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 04:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort Claims (Personal Injury)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questions taken under advisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refusals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 37.10(10)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undertakings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undertakings and refusals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grigoraslaw.com/?p=10271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If a party fails to provide satisfactory responses or declines to address valid inquiries during the discovery or cross-examination process, a motion for undertakings and refusals might be needed. This motion requests the court’s intervention to compel the party being examined to comply with their undertakings or address questions that were inappropriately refused.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com/motion-for-undertakings-and-refusals">Discovery Challenges: Undertakings and Refusals Motions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com">Toronto Civil &amp; Business Litigation Lawyers | Grigoras Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="10271" class="elementor elementor-10271" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-24d77c02 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default" data-id="24d77c02" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-60c03a36" data-id="60c03a36" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-eaf014e elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="eaf014e" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>If a party fails to provide satisfactory responses or declines to address valid inquiries during the discovery or cross-examination process, a motion for undertakings and refusals might be needed. This motion requests the court&#8217;s intervention to compel the party being examined to comply with their undertakings or address questions that were inappropriately refused. This article will cover the procedure and best practices for managing motions related to undertakings and refusals.</p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Understanding Undertakings, Refusals, and Questions Taken Under Advisement:</strong></span></p><p><strong>1.  Undertakings</strong> &#8211; An undertaking is given when a relevant question is asked during an examination, but the required information to respond is not available. The party being examined commits to making inquiries or conducting research to provide the answer at a later time. It&#8217;s crucial to distinguish between undertakings offered by a lawyer on behalf of their client and those provided personally. Undertakings are made on the party&#8217;s behalf, not the lawyer&#8217;s, unless explicitly agreed otherwise.</p><p><strong>2.  Refusals</strong> &#8211; A refusal takes place when the party being examined declines to respond to an unsuitable question. Common reasons for refusal include irrelevance, privilege, oppressiveness, abusiveness, inappropriateness for the witness to address, or relating only to the witness&#8217;s credibility.</p><p><strong>3.  Questions Taken Under Advisement</strong> &#8211; These are questions that require additional time for evaluation before deciding whether to answer. Unanswered advisements after 60 days are deemed refusals.</p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Getting Ready for the Undertakings and Refusals Motion:</strong></span></p><p><strong>1.  Participate in the Examination for Discovery or Cross-Examination</strong> &#8211; Ideally, the person preparing and presenting the motion should have attended the examination. If this isn&#8217;t feasible, collaborate with the examining attorney before preparing any documents.</p><p><strong>2.  Compile a List of Undertakings, Under Advisements, and Refusals</strong> &#8211; After an examination, use the official transcript to create a list of the opposing party&#8217;s undertakings, under advisements, and refusals.</p><p><strong>3.  Contact Opposing Counsel with the List and Request Responses</strong> &#8211; Send the list of undertakings, under advisements, and refusals to the opposing counsel, reminding them of the 60-day deadline for replies.</p><p><strong>4.  Establish Your Record with Persistent Follow-Ups with Opposing Counsel</strong> &#8211; Your motion record should display multiple follow-ups with the opposing counsel, demonstrating the opposing party&#8217;s failure to comply with undertakings within a reasonable period or refusal to address valid inquiries.</p><p><strong>5.  Evaluate the Motion&#8217;s Necessity and Obtain Client Instructions</strong> &#8211; When considering an undertakings and refusals motion, determine whether the outstanding responses are crucial to your client&#8217;s case. Consider the strategic benefits and expenses of the motion and examine alternatives, such as narrowing requests, gathering information from other sources, or resolving issues through case conferences.</p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Preparing Undertakings and Refusals Motion Documents:</strong></span></p><p><strong>1.  Request the Examination for Discovery Transcript</strong> &#8211; After receiving instructions for the motion, order the examination for discovery transcript to prepare and present the motion.</p><p><strong>2.  Identify the Specific Inquiries You Plan to Pursue</strong> &#8211; Review refusals and decide which ones are worth pursuing by considering legal or factual matters, relevance to particular allegations, legitimacy of refusal grounds, and other factors.</p><p><strong>3.  Draft the Notice of Motion</strong> &#8211; The Notice of Motion should contain the witness&#8217;s name, examination date, outstanding or wrongly refused undertakings/questions, unresponsiveness or noncompliance by the opposing party, and the relief sought.</p><p><strong>4.  Draft the Supporting Affidavit(s)</strong> &#8211; In the supporting affidavit(s), include a brief case background, procedural history, examination details, correspondence with opposing counsel, evidence of your client&#8217;s completed undertakings, any inadequate responses provided thus far (if applicable), a summary of outstanding information and documents, and their relevance to the case. You may also want to attach other relevant documents or transcript excerpts to the affidavit. Ensure that all responses are enclosed in the affidavit, showing the full exchange with counsel. Make sure that the person swearing the affidavit can speak to its content. (If a non-attending clerk or assistant swears it, they may only attach exhibits.) It&#8217;s recommended that an associate or partner involved in the case do it.</p><p><strong>5.  Attach the Pleadings</strong> &#8211; Attach the pleadings to help the court understand the nature of the case, the disputed issues, and the relevance of the questions to your client. Include pleadings as exhibits in the affidavit or separate tabs in the motion record.</p><p><strong>6.  Use the Rule 37.10(10) Chart</strong> &#8211; Use the <a href="https://ontariocourtforms.on.ca/static/media/uploads/courtforms/civil/37c/rcp-37c-e.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Ontario Courts Form 37C, Refusals and Undertakings Chart</strong></a>, to efficiently organize your oral argument. When bringing an undertakings and refusals motion, the moving party is required to create a chart, comprised of 6 columns (i.e., the <a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900194#BK362" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Rule 37.10(10)</strong></a> Chart). The last two columns of the chart are to be left blank; one column is for the responding party&#8217;s position and the other column is for the Judge&#8217;s/Associate Judge&#8217;s disposition.</p><p>For the first column of the chart, entitled &#8220;[t]he issue … and its connection to the pleading or affidavit,&#8221; there are three steps that must be taken:</p><ol><li style="list-style-type: none;"><ol><li>The moving party should clearly define the issue at hand, as using only one or two words is insufficient. Avoid generic terms like &#8220;liability&#8221; or &#8220;damages&#8221; that are prevalent in many cases. Instead, elaborate on the specific aspects of liability or the particular types of damages involved.</li><li>The moving party needs to identify the specific paragraphs in the pleadings (or affidavits, if the motion concerns a cross-examination on an affidavit) that help clarify the relevance of the requested information.</li><li>The moving party needs to connect the issue and the evidence, explaining the relevance of the cited evidence to the question at hand, and how or why an answer provided may be insufficient or incomplete in addressing the question. This involves giving context to the question, rather than requesting the Associate Judge to decide on questions that were not asked. (If privilege issues arise, the party should specify the type of privilege asserted and justify the claim with supporting evidence.)</li></ol></li></ol><p>When possible, arrange the questions in the chart by related topics, allowing oral submissions to address clusters of questions rather than each individually. Assign a unique number to every question for easy reference.</p><p>In the &#8220;Specific question&#8221; section, the moving party needs to accurately transcribe the question&#8217;s exact wording from the transcript and include bracketed references to the questions surrounding the refusal to provide context.</p><p>For undertakings and refusals motions, file the transcripts or pertinent sections (and upload it to CaseLines). These sections should contain enough detail to contextualize the question and accurately depict what was asked and answered.</p><p>Once the moving party completes their part of the chart, they must serve it on the responding party, who is then responsible for filling in their section.</p><p>In the section entitled &#8220;Answer or specific grounds for refusal,&#8221; the responding party is required to either address the question or clarify why an answer was not given or why the provided response is deemed adequate (see <a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900194#BK362" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>r. 37.10(10)(b)</strong></a>). Once completed, the chart should be sent back to the moving party for a discussion regarding any questions that can be withdrawn or answered. Following this, a refined version of the chart is to be prepared for submission to the court.</p><p>It is essential that the final chart includes input from both parties, enabling the court to reference a single, comprehensive document.</p><p><strong>7.  Consider Whether All or Part of the Motion Can Be Settled</strong> &#8211; Discuss with opposing counsel to resolve any questions before the motion. Demonstrate genuine efforts to conserve court resources and save client time and money. Document settlements and establish clear delivery timelines for answers. Consider formalizing agreements into consent-based court orders.</p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Preparing Your Arguments on the Merits:</strong></span></p><p>To prepare for arguments on merits, examine pleadings and relevant transcript sections, focus on disputes regarding provided information, and prepare counterarguments for opposing counsel&#8217;s reasons. Familiarize yourself with refusals and their basis, provide references to pleadings and documents, and address proportionality when needed. Update the motion&#8217;s status, including the number of original, answered, withdrawn, and remaining disputed questions.</p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Arguing the Motion:</strong></span></p><p>When arguing the motion in court:</p><ol><li>Brief the court on the motion&#8217;s current status and submit your updated Undertakings and Refusals Chart.</li><li>Inquire if the court needs an overview of the action and disputed issues.</li><li>Organize your arguments by groups, following the order in your chart, and prioritize important questions if time is limited.</li><li>Obtain a clear written endorsement from the court regarding the required information/documents and a deadline for delivery.</li><li>Anticipate a costs argument. The outcome of undertakings and refusals motions is often mixed, and the court will decide costs based on each party&#8217;s success. Costs are determined by comparing the number of questions ordered to be answered, settled, or withdrawn before the motion. If the moving party is more successful, costs should be awarded in its favour, and vice versa. In case of divided success, consider proposing costs paid in the cause or reserving motion costs to the trial judge.</li></ol>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
		<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-49f0bc7 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-child" data-id="49f0bc7" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
		<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-fe71bd5 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-child" data-id="fe71bd5" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-e876d4b elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="e876d4b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="heading.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">Are you dealing with uncooperative responses during discovery or cross-examination?</h2>				</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-90a6030 elementor-bg-transform elementor-bg-transform-move-up elementor-cta--skin-classic elementor-animated-content elementor-widget elementor-widget-call-to-action" data-id="90a6030" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="call-to-action.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<div class="elementor-cta">
							<div class="elementor-cta__content">
				
									<h2 class="elementor-cta__title elementor-cta__content-item elementor-content-item">
						Talk to a Civil Litigation Lawyer					</h2>
				
				
									<div class="elementor-cta__button-wrapper elementor-cta__content-item elementor-content-item ">
					<a class="elementor-cta__button elementor-button elementor-size-md" href="https://form.jotform.com/232254608728056" target="_blank">
						INTAKE FORM					</a>
					</div>
							</div>
						</div>
						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com/motion-for-undertakings-and-refusals">Discovery Challenges: Undertakings and Refusals Motions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://grigoraslaw.com">Toronto Civil &amp; Business Litigation Lawyers | Grigoras Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: grigoraslaw.com @ 2026-04-14 21:21:40 by W3 Total Cache
-->